健全人和脊髓损伤个体对残疾的评价比较。
Comparison of able-bodied and spinal cord injured individuals' appraisals of disability.
机构信息
Roosevelt University, Department of Psychology, Chicago, IL 60605, USA.
出版信息
Spinal Cord. 2013 Apr;51(4):338-40. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.169. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
STUDY DESIGN
Survey.
OBJECTIVES
Compare views of disability in able-bodied and spinal cord-injured individuals.
SETTING
United States.
METHODS
A group of able-bodied individuals were asked to imagine that they had sustained a spinal cord injury (SCI), then complete the Appraisals of DisAbility: primary and secondary scale (ADAPSS) as if they were injured. The mean scores of able-bodied individuals on each of the six Subscales was compared with the mean scores of real spinal cord-injured individuals using t-tests of independent means.
RESULTS
Responses of able-bodied individuals was significantly different from real SCI individuals on five of the six Subscales of the ADAPSS.
CONCLUSION
Able-bodied individuals' appraisals of disability after imagined SCI are much more negative than the actual appraisals of disability in real spinal cord-injured individuals.
研究设计
调查。
目的
比较健全人和脊髓损伤个体对残疾的看法。
地点
美国。
方法
一组健全人被要求想象他们遭受了脊髓损伤（SCI），然后像受伤一样完成残疾评估：主要和次要量表（ADAPSS）。使用独立样本 t 检验比较每个六个分量表上的健全人平均得分与真实脊髓损伤个体的平均得分。
结果
在 ADAPSS 的六个分量表中的五个分量表上，健全人的反应与真实 SCI 个体明显不同。
结论
想象 SCI 后，健全人对残疾的评估比真实脊髓损伤个体的实际残疾评估要消极得多。
Zotero 插件