Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Spinal Cord. 2022 Nov;60(11):954-962. doi: 10.1038/s41393-022-00756-3. Epub 2022 May 6.
Scoping review.
To describe the meaning of cognitive appraisals, their relation with outcome. measures, and adapted appraisal scales after Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) in the existing literature.
This review was performed according to the Arksey and O'Malley (2005) framework that consisted of five steps: setting the review question, searching the literature, selecting and classifying the studies, charting the data, and summarizing the results. Published articles from 1990 to 16 May 2020 related to cognitive appraisal, persons with traumatic SCI (TSCI), and persons older than 18 years were identified by searching by key terms in four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase).
The included studies (n = 26) were categorized into three categories. Categories focused on the meanings of cognitive appraisals following TSCI (i.e., appraisals being complex and context-related, or in general definition how persons with TSCI interpret their disability and how they evaluate the resources available to respond to it), the relationship between cognitive appraisals and physical/psychological/social/ outcomes, and appraisals of disability (including the use of appraisals as a predictor of subsequent positive or negative consequences).
The results demonstrated that a cognitive appraisal of TSCI is critical to longer-term rehabilitation outcomes. A combination of physical and psychological-based interventions can help to modify negative or dysfunctional appraisals. Cognitive appraisal in TSCI seems to vary from person to person. To predict it and develop a rehabilitation plan, future research needs to focus on the relationship between cognitive appraisal and person-related factors, including demographic characteristics.
范围综述。
描述认知评估的含义,及其与现有文献中脊髓损伤(SCI)后结局、测量方法和适应性评估量表的关系。
本综述按照 Arksey 和 O'Malley(2005)的框架进行,共分为五个步骤:设定综述问题、搜索文献、选择和分类研究、图表数据和总结结果。通过在四个数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Embase)中搜索关键词,检索了 1990 年至 2020 年 5 月 16 日与认知评估、创伤性 SCI(TSCI)患者和年龄大于 18 岁的患者相关的已发表文章。
纳入的研究(n=26)分为三类。分类重点为 TSCI 后认知评估的意义(即评估复杂且与情境相关,或一般定义为 TSCI 患者如何解释他们的残疾以及他们如何评估可用的资源来应对残疾)、认知评估与身体/心理/社会/结局之间的关系,以及残疾评估(包括将评估作为随后出现积极或消极后果的预测因素)。
结果表明,对 TSCI 的认知评估对长期康复结局至关重要。结合基于身体和心理的干预措施可以帮助改变负面或功能失调的评估。TSCI 中的认知评估似乎因人而异。为了预测它并制定康复计划,未来的研究需要关注认知评估与个体相关因素之间的关系,包括人口统计学特征。