Suppr超能文献

根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁的病理生理学

Pathophysiology of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Presti J C, Schmidt R A, Narayan P A, Carroll P R, Tanagho E A

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco.

出版信息

J Urol. 1990 May;143(5):975-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40155-8.

Abstract

To define the origin of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy urodynamic studies in 24 incontinent patients were compared to those of 13 continent patients. A statistically significant difference between incontinent and continent patients was found for the mean functional profile length (2.1 versus 3.6 cm., respectively, p less than 0.001), maximal urethral closure pressure (39 versus 74 cm. water, respectively, p less than 0.001) and maximal urethral closure pressure during voluntary contraction of the external sphincter (107 versus 172 cm. water, respectively, p less than 0.002). The differences among maximal detrusor pressure, initial bladder volume at which a detrusor contraction occurs, maximal cystometric capacity and residual urine were not statistically significant between the 2 groups. Urethral instability was present in 1 of the 24 incontinent patients (4.2%) and in none of the 13 continent patients, while detrusor instability was present in 6 (25%) and 3 (23.1%), respectively. Urethral and detrusor instability correlated poorly with incontinence (correlation coefficients 0.123 and 0.021, respectively). The appearance of the bladder outlet on voiding cystourethrography was correlated with urodynamic parameters and the presence or absence of continence. Tubularization above the level of the external sphincter was present in continent but absent in incontinent patients. Continence after radical prostatectomy is dependent upon sphincteric efficiency, which may be influenced by the anatomical configuration of the reconstructed bladder outlet and the integrity of the distal urethral sphincteric mechanism.

摘要

为明确根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁的根源,对24例尿失禁患者和13例控尿患者的尿动力学研究结果进行了比较。发现尿失禁患者与控尿患者在平均功能轮廓长度(分别为2.1厘米和3.6厘米,p<0.001)、最大尿道闭合压(分别为39厘米水柱和74厘米水柱,p<0.001)以及外括约肌自主收缩时的最大尿道闭合压(分别为107厘米水柱和172厘米水柱,p<0.002)方面存在统计学显著差异。两组之间在最大逼尿肌压力、出现逼尿肌收缩时的初始膀胱容量、最大膀胱测压容量和残余尿量方面的差异无统计学意义。24例尿失禁患者中有1例(4.2%)存在尿道不稳定,13例控尿患者中均无尿道不稳定情况;而逼尿肌不稳定分别存在于6例(25%)尿失禁患者和3例(23.1%)控尿患者中。尿道和逼尿肌不稳定与尿失禁的相关性较差(相关系数分别为0.123和0.021)。排尿性膀胱尿道造影显示的膀胱出口外观与尿动力学参数以及控尿情况相关。控尿患者在尿道外括约肌水平以上存在管状化,而尿失禁患者则无。根治性前列腺切除术后的控尿取决于括约肌效率,这可能受重建膀胱出口的解剖结构和远端尿道括约肌机制完整性的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验