• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

合适的锥形尺寸以实现宫颈上皮内瘤变的子宫颈大圈切除术(loop excision of transformation zone,LLETZ)后的负切缘。

Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

机构信息

First Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Athens, Athens, Greece. DiPapoutsis @ yahoo.com

出版信息

Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2013;75(3):163-8. doi: 10.1159/000345864. Epub 2012 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1159/000345864
PMID:23296191
Abstract

AIMS

To determine appropriate cone dimensions for predicting margin status after large loop excision of transformation zone (LLETZ) treatment.

METHODS

An observational study performed at the Colposcopy Unit of a university hospital setting involving patients who underwent LLETZ conisation within a 1-year period. Data concerning the characteristics, cone dimensions, lesion grade and excision margins of the patients were recorded.

RESULTS

The median age of the women (n = 61) was 38 years (18-53). LLETZ cone specimens had 36.1% of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)2/3 lesion and 13.1% positive margins. Mean cone depth and volume were 10.9 mm and 2.3 cm(3), respectively. Multiple logistic regression for main predictors and after adjustment for age, parity and CIN severity showed that cone volume and length, cone base surface and proportion of excised volume had a significant effect on margin positivity. ROC analysis showed that optimal cut-off for cone volume was 2.1 cm(3) (87.5% sensitivity - 54.7% specificity) or 8.6% of initial cervical volume (75% sensitivity - 75.5% specificity), and for cone length it was 10 mm (100% sensitivity - 52.8% specificity). Optimal cut-off for cone base surface as percentage of ectocervical surface was 32.7% (75% sensitivity - 69.8% specificity).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings should be taken into consideration when planning the outer boundaries of excision and cervical tissue to be removed so as to achieve oncologically safe limits.

摘要

目的

确定用于预测大环形电切术(LLETZ)治疗后切缘状态的合适锥形尺寸。

方法

在一所大学医院的阴道镜检查单位进行了一项观察性研究,涉及在一年内接受 LLETZ 锥形切除术的患者。记录了患者的特征、锥形尺寸、病变等级和切除边缘的数据。

结果

女性(n=61)的中位年龄为 38 岁(18-53 岁)。LLETZ 锥形标本中 36.1%为宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)2/3 病变,13.1%为阳性切缘。平均锥形深度和体积分别为 10.9 毫米和 2.3 立方厘米。主要预测因素的多元逻辑回归分析,以及在调整年龄、产次和 CIN 严重程度后,锥形体积和长度、锥形基底面积和切除体积比例对切缘阳性有显著影响。ROC 分析显示,锥形体积的最佳截断值为 2.1 立方厘米(87.5%的敏感性-54.7%的特异性)或初始宫颈体积的 8.6%(75%的敏感性-75.5%的特异性),而锥形长度的最佳截断值为 10 毫米(100%的敏感性-52.8%的特异性)。锥形基底面积占外宫颈表面的百分比的最佳截断值为 32.7%(75%的敏感性-69.8%的特异性)。

结论

在计划切除边缘和要切除的宫颈组织时,应考虑这些发现,以达到肿瘤学安全的范围。

相似文献

1
Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.合适的锥形尺寸以实现宫颈上皮内瘤变的子宫颈大圈切除术(loop excision of transformation zone,LLETZ)后的负切缘。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2013;75(3):163-8. doi: 10.1159/000345864. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
2
Cervical cone measurements and residual disease in LLETZ conisation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.宫颈锥形切除术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变时的宫颈锥切测量和残留病变。
In Vivo. 2011 Jul-Aug;25(4):691-5.
3
Large loop versus straight-wire excision of the transformation zone for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial of electrosurgical techniques.大环形切除术与直型电切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的随机对照试验:电外科技术的比较。
BJOG. 2015 Mar;122(4):552-7. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13200. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
4
The volume perspective: a comparison of two excisional treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (laser versus LLETZ).体积视角:两种宫颈上皮内瘤变切除术式(激光与 LLETZ)的比较。
BJOG. 2010 Apr;117(5):615-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02501.x. Epub 2010 Feb 15.
5
Regeneration of uterine cervix at 6 months after large loop excision of the transformation zone for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.宫颈高级别上皮内瘤变行大环形电切术后 6 个月宫颈再生。
BJOG. 2012 May;119(6):678-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03275.x. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
6
Influence of training level on cervical cone size and resection margin status at conization: a retrospective study.训练水平对宫颈锥切术时宫颈锥大小及切缘状态的影响:一项回顾性研究
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Jun;297(6):1517-1523. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4761-1. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
7
Predictive factors for residual disease in the uterine cervix after large loop excision of the transformation zone in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.宫颈上皮内瘤变III级患者转化区大环状切除术后宫颈残留病灶的预测因素
J Med Assoc Thai. 2010 Feb;93 Suppl 2:S74-80.
8
Small lesion size measured by colposcopy may predict absence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a large loop excision of the transformation zone specimen.阴道镜测量的小病灶大小可能预测转化区大环形切除术标本中不存在宫颈上皮内瘤变。
BJOG. 2017 Feb;124(3):495-502. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14247. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
9
Number of fragments, margin status and thermal artifacts of conized specimens from LLETZ surgery to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.用于治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的LEETZ手术中锥切标本的碎片数量、切缘状态及热效应伪影
Sao Paulo Med J. 2012;130(2):92-6. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802012000200004.
10
An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens.异常前颈内子宫颈管刮除术结果是锥切标本中阳性边缘的独立危险因素。
Oncol Res Treat. 2020;43(10):518-525. doi: 10.1159/000509254. Epub 2020 Aug 7.

引用本文的文献

1
POSITIVE CONE MARGINS - A DISADVANTAGE OF THE LARGE LOOP EXCISION OF TRANSFORMATION ZONE TECHNIQUE?阳性切缘——转化区大环形切除术技术的一个缺点?
Acta Clin Croat. 2024 Oct;63(2):300-305. doi: 10.20471/acc.2024.63.02.5.
2
Long-Term Reassurance with Negative High-Risk Human Papillomavirus (HR-HPV) and Clear Margins After Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ).转化区大环状切除术(LLETZ)后高危型人乳头瘤病毒(HR-HPV)阴性且切缘清晰的长期预后
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 1;17(3):487. doi: 10.3390/cancers17030487.
3
Impact of Excision Type, Cone Volume, and Dimensions on Persistence/Recurrence of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2-3.
切除类型、锥形体积和尺寸对宫颈上皮内瘤变2-3级持续存在/复发的影响
Life (Basel). 2024 Jul 31;14(8):968. doi: 10.3390/life14080968.
4
Rate of Involved Endocervical Margins According to High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Subtype and Transformation Zone Type in Specimens with Cone Length ≤ 10 mm versus > 10 mm-A Retrospective Analysis.根据高危型人乳头瘤病毒亚型和转化区类型,对锥切长度≤10mm与>10mm标本的宫颈管切缘累及率进行回顾性分析。
Life (Basel). 2023 Aug 20;13(8):1775. doi: 10.3390/life13081775.
5
Are "additional cuts" effective for positive margins in cervical conization? It varies according to the doctor.在宫颈锥切术中,“附加切除”对于切缘阳性是否有效?这取决于医生。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug 23;21(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03119-1.
6
Operator Sex and Experience Do Not Influence Conization Outcomes in Terms of Cone Volume, Depth or Resection Margins.手术医生的性别和经验不会影响锥切体积、深度或切缘的情况。
In Vivo. 2023 Mar-Apr;37(2):841-847. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13151.
7
Evaluating a novel 3D printed model for simulating Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ).评估一种用于模拟转化区大环形切除术(LLETZ)的新型3D打印模型。
3D Print Med. 2022 Jun 8;8(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s41205-022-00143-x.
8
Improving the surgical performance during LLETZ cervical excision to optimise oncological and obstetric outcomes: critical appraisal of a novel high-fidelity simulator.提高宫颈环形电切术(LLETZ)的手术操作水平以优化肿瘤学和产科结局:对一种新型高保真模拟器的批判性评估
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 May;307(5):1643-1644. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06576-3. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
9
Introducing a novel model for simulating large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) using 3D printing technique.引入一种使用 3D 打印技术模拟大环形电切术(LLETZ)的新型模型。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Mar;305(3):703-712. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06209-1. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
10
The effects of different instruments and suture methods of conization for cervical lesions.不同器械和缝合方法在宫颈病变锥切术中的效果。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 13;9(1):19114. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55786-4.