Suppr超能文献

氟轻松(Retisert)与地塞米松(Ozurdex)玻璃体内植入物治疗葡萄膜炎的比较。

A comparison between the fluocinolone acetonide (Retisert) and dexamethasone (Ozurdex) intravitreal implants in uveitis.

机构信息

Massachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institution, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.

出版信息

J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Jun;29(5):501-7. doi: 10.1089/jop.2012.0180. Epub 2013 Jan 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the fluocinolone acetonide (Retisert) implant compared with the dexamethasone (Ozurdex) implant in patients with noninfectious uveitis.

DESIGN

Comparative case series.

STUDY PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-seven eyes received either the fluocinolone acetonide (FA) (n=16) or dexamethasone (n=11) implant.

METHODS

Chart review of patients at the Massachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institution (MERSI) was done and patients were selected and matched according to age, sex, and type of uveitis. Eyes that received either the FA or dexamethasone implant, with follow-up ranging from 6 months to 2 years, were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The recurrence rate of uveitis after implantation.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the baseline demographic characteristics. The majority of cases were idiopathic panuveitis, with 36.4% and 31.3% of eyes in the Ozurdex and Retisert groups, respectively. Recurrence rates of uveitis were 1.7 and 0.5 per 100 person-months in the Retisert and Ozurdex groups, respectively, with Retisert-implanted eyes 3.16 times more at risk of recurrence; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.41). No significant differences were seen in terms of improvement in inflammatory score and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The median survival time for a second implant was 13 and 28 months for the Ozurdex and Retisert groups, respectively (P=0.0028). Eyes with the Ozurdex were 5 times more likely to receive a second implant (P=0.02). No eyes in the Ozurdex group needed additional glaucoma medications, surgery, or laser compared to 44% of eyes in the Retisert group. Eyes with the Retisert implant had a statistically higher rate of having more glaucoma medications, surgery, or laser (P=0.02). In the Ozurdex group, 50% of phakic eyes at baseline had cataract progression and subsequent surgery compared with 100% of Retisert phakic eyes. Eyes with the Retisert implant are 4.7 times more at risk of cataract progression (P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The dexamethasone (Ozurdex) implant seems comparable to the fluocinolone acetonide (Retisert) implant in preventing recurrence of noninfectious uveitis and in improving inflammation and BCVA. However, there were higher rates of cataract progression and need for glaucoma medications, laser, and surgery with the Retisert implant.

摘要

目的

评估氟轻松(Retisert)植入物与地塞米松(Ozurdex)植入物在非感染性葡萄膜炎患者中的疗效和安全性。

设计

比较病例系列。

研究参与者

27 只眼睛分别接受氟轻松(FA)(n=16)或地塞米松(n=11)植入物。

方法

对马萨诸塞州眼研究与手术机构(MERSI)的患者进行图表回顾,根据年龄、性别和葡萄膜炎类型选择和匹配患者。纳入接受 FA 或地塞米松植入物、随访时间为 6 个月至 2 年的患者。

主要观察指标

植入后葡萄膜炎的复发率。

结果

两组患者的基线人口统计学特征无显著差异。大多数病例为特发性全葡萄膜炎,Ozurdex 和 Retisert 组分别占 36.4%和 31.3%。Retisert 和 Ozurdex 组的葡萄膜炎复发率分别为每 100 人月 1.7 和 0.5 例,Retisert 植入眼的复发风险高 3.16 倍,但差异无统计学意义(P=0.41)。两组患者的炎症评分和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)改善情况无显著差异。Ozurdex 组的中位二次植入时间为 13 个月,Retisert 组为 28 个月(P=0.0028)。Ozurdex 组的眼睛再次植入的可能性是 Retisert 组的 5 倍(P=0.02)。Ozurdex 组无眼需要额外的青光眼药物、手术或激光治疗,而 Retisert 组有 44%的眼需要。Retisert 植入眼的青光眼药物、手术或激光治疗的发生率明显更高(P=0.02)。Ozurdex 组有 50%的初诊白内障眼在基线时有白内障进展和随后的手术,而 Retisert 组的初诊白内障眼有 100%。Retisert 植入眼发生白内障进展的风险高 4.7 倍(P=0.04)。

结论

地塞米松(Ozurdex)植入物在预防非感染性葡萄膜炎复发、改善炎症和 BCVA 方面似乎与氟轻松(Retisert)植入物相当。然而,Retisert 植入物的白内障进展率和需要青光眼药物、激光和手术的发生率更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验