Case Comprehensive Hernia Center, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106-5047, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jun;27(6):2076-81. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2713-6. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
A variety of permanent and absorbable tacks are available for mesh fixation during laparoscopic hernia repairs. Although manufacturers recommend deploying tacks perpendicular to the tissue, achieving this can sometimes be challenging. This study aimed to analyze comparatively the effects of angled deployment among commonly used tacks.
A piece of composite mesh was fixed to the peritoneal surface of a pig with a single tack fired at either a perpendicular (90°) or acute (30°) angle. A lap-shear test was performed to determine fixation strength. Two permanent tacks (a titanium spiral tack: Protack [PT]; and a hollow screw fastener: PermaFix [PF]) and three absorbable tackers (a solid screw: Absorbatack [AT]; a hollow screw fastener: SorbaFix [SF]; and a strap: SecurStrap [SS]) were challenged. A total of 16 samples were performed for each device at each angle. A nonabsorbable transfascial suture was used as a control condition.
Transabdominal sutures had the maximum acute tensile strength (ATS) (29.9 ± 5.5 N). Protack at both 90° and 30° performed significantly better than absorbable tacks (p < 0.01). No significant difference was found among absorbable tacks at 90°. When the same construct was compared at different angles, SS and SF performance was not affected (p = 0.07 and 0.2, respectively). In contrast, PT and AT had significantly reduced fixation strength (p = 0.003 and 0.004, respectively). However, PT fired at an acute angle had fixation equal to that of absorbable tacks fired perpendicularly.
Transabdominal sutures performed better than tacks in the acute setting. No absorbable fixation device demonstrated superior efficacy within its class. Spiral titanium tacks provided better fixation than absorbable tacks at both perpendicular and acute angles. Moreover, titanium spiral tacks deployed at 30° performed equal to or better than absorbable tacks fired perpendicularly to the tissue. It appears that spiral titanium tacks should be strongly considered for cases in which perpendicular tack deployment cannot be achieved.
在腹腔镜疝修补术中,有多种永久性和可吸收的缝合钉可用于网片固定。尽管制造商建议将缝合钉钉垂直于组织,但有时很难实现这一点。本研究旨在比较分析常用缝合钉在成角固定中的效果。
将一块复合网片固定在猪的腹膜表面,用单个缝合钉钉垂直(90°)或锐角(30°)固定。进行 lap-shear 测试以确定固定强度。挑战了两种永久性缝合钉(钛制螺旋缝合钉:Protack [PT];和空心螺钉紧固件:PermaFix [PF])和三种可吸收缝合钉(实心螺钉:Absorbatack [AT];空心螺钉紧固件:SorbaFix [SF];和皮带:SecurStrap [SS])。每个装置在每个角度都进行了 16 个样本。非吸收性经腹缝线作为对照条件。
经腹缝线具有最大的急性拉伸强度(ATS)(29.9±5.5N)。PT 在 90°和 30°时的性能明显优于可吸收缝合钉(p<0.01)。在 90°时,可吸收缝合钉之间没有发现显著差异。当在不同角度比较相同的结构时,SS 和 SF 的性能不受影响(p=0.07 和 0.2)。相比之下,PT 和 AT 的固定强度显著降低(p=0.003 和 0.004)。然而,锐角发射的 PT 固定强度与垂直发射的可吸收缝合钉相同。
经腹缝线在急性环境下的性能优于缝合钉。在其同类产品中,没有任何可吸收的固定装置表现出优越的效果。螺旋钛缝合钉在垂直和锐角固定时均优于可吸收缝合钉。此外,30°角发射的钛螺旋缝合钉的性能与垂直于组织发射的可吸收缝合钉相同或更好。因此,在无法垂直放置缝合钉的情况下,应强烈考虑使用螺旋钛缝合钉。