Suppr超能文献

可吸收网片固定系统在腹腔镜腹疝修补术中的拉伸强度测试。

Tensile strength testing for resorbable mesh fixation systems in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

机构信息

Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Service, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, De Pintelaan 185, 2K12-IC, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2012 Sep;26(9):2513-20. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2224-5. Epub 2012 Apr 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In an attempt to improve patient outcome and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, resorbable fixation devices have been developed to allow adequate mesh fixation while minimizing accompanying side-effects as tack erosion and adhesion formation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In experimental set-up, 24 pigs were treated by laparoscopic mesh placement. Two different meshes (PP/ORC and PP/ePTFE) and four fixation devices were evaluated: a 6.4 mm poly(D,L: )-lactide pushpin (tack I), a 6.8 mm poly(D,L: )-lactide with blunt tip (tack II), a 4.1 mm poly(glycolide-co-L-lactide) (tack III) and one titanium tack (control tack). A first group of animals (n = 12) was euthanized after 2 weeks survival and a second group (n = 12) after 6 months. At euthanasia, a relaparoscopy was performed to assess adhesion formation followed by laparotomy with excision of the entire abdominal wall. Tensile strength of the individual fixation systems was tested with the use of a tensiometer by measuring the force to pull the tack out of the mesh. Additionally, the foreign body reaction to the fixation systems was evaluated histologically as was their potential degradation.

RESULTS

At 2 weeks the tensile strength was significantly higher for the control tack (31.98 N/cm²) compared to the resorbable devices. Except for tack II, the tensile strength was higher when the devices were fixed in a PP/ePTFE mesh compared to the PP/ORC mesh. After 6 months only tack III was completely resorbed, while tack I (9.292 N/cm²) had the lowest tensile strength. At this time-point similar tensile strength was observed for both tack II (29.56 N/cm²) and the control tack (27.77 N/cm²). Adhesions seem to be more depending on the type of mesh, in favor of PP/ePTFE.

CONCLUSION

At long term, the 4.1 mm poly(glycolide-co-L-lactide) tack was the only tack completely resorbed while the 6.8 mm poly(D,L: )-lactide tack with blunt tip reached equal strengths to the permanent tack.

摘要

背景

为了改善腹腔镜腹侧疝修补术后患者的预后和生活质量,已经开发出可吸收固定装置,以便在最小化伴随的副作用(如缝合钉侵蚀和粘连形成)的同时,充分固定网片。

材料和方法

在实验设计中,24 头猪接受腹腔镜网片放置治疗。评估了两种不同的网片(PP/ORC 和 PP/ePTFE)和四种固定装置:一种 6.4mm 的聚(D,L:)-丙交酯推钉(缝合钉 I)、一种 6.8mm 的聚(D,L:)-丙交酯钝头缝合钉(缝合钉 II)、一种 4.1mm 的聚(乙交酯-co-L-丙交酯)缝合钉(缝合钉 III)和一种钛缝合钉(对照缝合钉)。一组动物(n=12)在存活 2 周后安乐死,另一组(n=12)在 6 个月后安乐死。安乐死后进行再次腹腔镜检查以评估粘连形成,然后进行剖腹手术切除整个腹壁。使用拉力计测试各个固定系统的拉伸强度,通过测量将缝合钉从网片中拔出的力来测试。此外,还通过组织学评估了固定系统的异物反应及其潜在降解。

结果

在 2 周时,对照缝合钉(31.98N/cm²)的拉伸强度明显高于可吸收装置。除了缝合钉 II 外,当装置固定在 PP/ePTFE 网片中时,拉伸强度高于固定在 PP/ORC 网片中的强度。6 个月后,只有缝合钉 III 完全吸收,而缝合钉 I(9.292N/cm²)的拉伸强度最低。此时,缝合钉 II(29.56N/cm²)和对照缝合钉(27.77N/cm²)的拉伸强度相似。粘连似乎更取决于网片的类型,有利于 PP/ePTFE。

结论

在长期随访中,4.1mm 聚(乙交酯-co-L-丙交酯)缝合钉是唯一完全吸收的缝合钉,而 6.8mm 聚(D,L:)-丙交酯钝头缝合钉达到了与永久性缝合钉相同的强度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验