• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考虑预算限制和风险的最大化 3 期药物开发组合价值的数学模型。

A mathematical model for maximizing the value of phase 3 drug development portfolios incorporating budget constraints and risk.

机构信息

Cytel Inc., 675 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2013 May 10;32(10):1763-77. doi: 10.1002/sim.5731. Epub 2013 Jan 9.

DOI:10.1002/sim.5731
PMID:23300097
Abstract

We describe a value-driven approach to optimizing pharmaceutical portfolios. Our approach incorporates inputs from research and development and commercial functions by simultaneously addressing internal and external factors. This approach differentiates itself from current practices in that it recognizes the impact of study design parameters, sample size in particular, on the portfolio value. We develop an integer programming (IP) model as the basis for Bayesian decision analysis to optimize phase 3 development portfolios using expected net present value as the criterion. We show how this framework can be used to determine optimal sample sizes and trial schedules to maximize the value of a portfolio under budget constraints. We then illustrate the remarkable flexibility of the IP model to answer a variety of 'what-if' questions that reflect situations that arise in practice. We extend the IP model to a stochastic IP model to incorporate uncertainty in the availability of drugs from earlier development phases for phase 3 development in the future. We show how to use stochastic IP to re-optimize the portfolio development strategy over time as new information accumulates and budget changes occur.

摘要

我们描述了一种基于价值的药物研发组合优化方法。该方法通过同时考虑内部和外部因素,整合了研发和商业部门的投入。与当前的实践方法不同,该方法认识到研究设计参数(尤其是样本量)对投资组合价值的影响。我们开发了一个整数规划 (IP) 模型作为贝叶斯决策分析的基础,以期望净现值为标准优化 3 期开发组合。我们展示了如何使用该框架来确定最佳样本量和试验计划,以在预算限制下最大化投资组合的价值。然后,我们说明了 IP 模型的显著灵活性,以回答各种“假设”问题,这些问题反映了实践中出现的情况。我们将 IP 模型扩展为随机 IP 模型,以纳入未来 3 期开发中早期开发阶段药物供应的不确定性。我们展示了如何随着新信息的积累和预算的变化,使用随机 IP 来重新优化投资组合开发策略。

相似文献

1
A mathematical model for maximizing the value of phase 3 drug development portfolios incorporating budget constraints and risk.考虑预算限制和风险的最大化 3 期药物开发组合价值的数学模型。
Stat Med. 2013 May 10;32(10):1763-77. doi: 10.1002/sim.5731. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
2
A Bayesian approach for incorporating economic factors in sample size design for clinical trials of individual drugs and portfolios of drugs.一种用于在单个药物及药物组合的临床试验样本量设计中纳入经济因素的贝叶斯方法。
Stat Med. 2007 Nov 30;26(27):4976-88. doi: 10.1002/sim.2955.
3
The Rheumatoid Arthritis Drug Development Model: a case study in Bayesian clinical trial simulation.类风湿性关节炎药物研发模型:贝叶斯临床试验模拟的一个案例研究
Pharm Stat. 2009 Oct-Dec;8(4):371-89. doi: 10.1002/pst.368.
4
A behavioural Bayes approach to the determination of sample size for clinical trials considering efficacy and safety: imbalanced sample size in treatment groups.一种行为贝叶斯方法在临床试验中用于确定考虑疗效和安全性的样本量:处理组中不平衡的样本量。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2011 Aug;20(4):389-400. doi: 10.1177/0962280209358131. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
5
On the choice of doses for phase III clinical trials.关于 III 期临床试验剂量的选择。
Stat Med. 2013 May 10;32(10):1661-76. doi: 10.1002/sim.5632. Epub 2012 Sep 30.
6
Optimal sample size determinations from an industry perspective based on the expected value of information.从行业角度基于信息期望值确定最优样本量。
Clin Trials. 2008;5(6):587-94. doi: 10.1177/1740774508098413.
7
Collection, synthesis, and interpretation of evidence: a proof-of-concept study in COPD.证据的收集、综合和解释:COPD 的概念验证研究。
Stat Med. 2013 May 10;32(10):1621-34. doi: 10.1002/sim.5730. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
8
Optimal Allocation of Research Funds under a Budget Constraint.预算约束下研究资金的最优分配
Med Decis Making. 2020 Aug;40(6):797-814. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20944875.
9
Utility-based optimization of phase II/III programs.基于效用的II/III期试验方案优化
Stat Med. 2016 Jan 30;35(2):305-16. doi: 10.1002/sim.6624. Epub 2015 Aug 9.
10
Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.基于二次损失函数的贝叶斯决策理论组序贯临床试验设计:频率学派评估
Clin Trials. 2007;4(1):5-14. doi: 10.1177/1740774506075764.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision-Making Criteria and Methods for Initiating Late-Stage Clinical Trials in Drug Development From a Multi-Stakeholder Perspective: A Scoping Review.从多利益相关方角度看药物研发中启动后期临床试验的决策标准与方法:一项范围综述
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Apr;117(4):978-988. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3566. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
2
Planning for the Next Pandemic: Ethics and Innovation Today for Improved Clinical Trials Tomorrow.为下一次大流行做准备:今日的伦理与创新,铸就明日更好的临床试验。
Stat Biopharm Res. 2022;14(1):22-27. doi: 10.1080/19466315.2021.1918236. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
3
Innovations in Clinical Development in Rare Diseases of Children and Adults: Small Populations and/or Small Patients.
儿童和成人罕见病临床开发的创新:小人群和/或小患者。
Paediatr Drugs. 2022 Nov;24(6):657-669. doi: 10.1007/s40272-022-00538-7. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
4
Prioritizing investments in rapid response vaccine technologies for emerging infections: A portfolio decision analysis.优先投资于新兴传染病的快速反应疫苗技术:投资组合决策分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 11;16(2):e0246235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246235. eCollection 2021.
5
A modelling framework for improved design and decision-making in drug development.用于改进药物开发中设计和决策的建模框架。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 28;14(8):e0220812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220812. eCollection 2019.
6
Decision-theoretic designs for small trials and pilot studies: A review.小型试验和试点研究的决策理论设计:综述
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Jun;25(3):1022-38. doi: 10.1177/0962280215588245. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
7
Decision-making in product portfolios of pharmaceutical research and development--managing streams of innovation in highly regulated markets.制药研发产品组合中的决策制定——在高度监管的市场中管理创新流
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2014 Oct 21;8:2009-16. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S68579. eCollection 2014.
8
Model-based clinical drug development in the past, present and future: a commentary.基于模型的临床药物研发的过去、现在与未来:一篇述评
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jan;79(1):108-16. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12341.