Skogen Jens Christoffer, Overland Simon
Research Centre for Health Promotion and Development, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen , N-5015 Bergen , Norway ; Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Division of Mental Health, Department of Public Mental Health , N-0403 Bergen , Norway.
JRSM Short Rep. 2012 Aug;3(8):59. doi: 10.1258/shorts.2012.012048. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
The fetal origins of adult disease (FOAD) hypothesis suggests that risk factors from intrauterine environmental exposures affect the fetus' development during sensitive periods, and increases the risk of specific diseases in adult life. This link was initially observed between prenatal exposures and adult coronary heart disease, but corresponding observations have later been published for a range of chronic conditions. Although the hypothesis has been praised as an essential shift in our understanding of determinants for health, the hypothesis has also been criticized on a number of accounts, both methodologically and theoretically. The aim of this paper is to critically discuss the FOAD-hypothesis, in relation to the epidemiological evidence. We conclude that much of the research literature on the FOAD-hypothesis finds support for the hypothesis. Despite this, it is still unclear if the effects are independent and what the public health relevance is. Notwithstanding the heart of the hypothesis - that environmental influences during gestation have an effect on later development - should be considered a major insight and constitutes a complement to a focus on genetic and more proximal factors (such as adult lifestyle) as causes of adult disease. As the search for determinants for disease and health continues, the FOAD-hypothesis is likely to remain an important perspective. It may however be better positioned as part of a broader life course perspective, rather than as an independent hypothesis.
成人疾病的胎儿起源(FOAD)假说表明,子宫内环境暴露产生的风险因素在敏感期影响胎儿发育,并增加成年后患特定疾病的风险。这种联系最初是在产前暴露与成人冠心病之间观察到的,但后来针对一系列慢性疾病也发表了相应的观察结果。尽管该假说被誉为我们对健康决定因素理解的重大转变,但在方法和理论上也受到了一些批评。本文的目的是结合流行病学证据对FOAD假说进行批判性讨论。我们得出的结论是,关于FOAD假说的许多研究文献都支持该假说。尽管如此,目前仍不清楚这些影响是否独立以及其公共卫生相关性如何。尽管该假说的核心观点——孕期的环境影响会对后期发育产生作用——应被视为一项重大见解,并且是对将遗传因素和更直接因素(如成人生活方式)作为成人疾病病因这一关注点的补充。随着对疾病和健康决定因素的探索不断深入,FOAD假说可能仍将是一个重要的观点。然而,将其作为更广泛的生命历程观点的一部分,而非一个独立的假说,可能会更合适。