Ali G, Lübcke R, Schlup M, Barbezat G O
Department of Medicine, University of Otago School of Medicine, Dunedin.
N Z Med J. 1990 Apr 25;103(888):184-6.
A new fine needle aspiration biopsy technique (Vacu-Cut, 19.5 G) was compared to the 17 G Menghini needle in 20 consecutive patients scheduled for routine percutaneous liver biopsy (10 at random with each needle). The Menghini system was superior in producing sufficient material for histological assessment with 90% success on first pass biopsy (100% with 12 passes in 11 patients) as compared to 60% with the Vacu-Cut needle (90% with 16 passes in 10 patients). The latter was easier to use. Ability to reach a histological diagnosis was 100% with both needles. No major complications occurred: only one Vacu-Cut patient (10%) developed pain at the puncture site as compared to seven patients (65%) in the Menghini group, irrespective of number of passes. The ease of use and lower incidence of pain may favour the Vacu-Cut needle in selected ill patients.
将一种新的细针穿刺活检技术(Vacu-Cut,19.5G)与17G的Menghini针在20例计划进行常规经皮肝活检的连续患者中进行了比较(随机选取10例使用每种针)。Menghini系统在获取足够用于组织学评估的材料方面更具优势,首次穿刺活检成功率为90%(11例患者中12次穿刺成功率为100%),而Vacu-Cut针的成功率为60%(10例患者中16次穿刺成功率为90%)。后者使用起来更简便。两种针的组织学诊断能力均为100%。未发生重大并发症:与Menghini组的7例患者(65%)相比,Vacu-Cut组仅1例患者(10%)在穿刺部位出现疼痛,与穿刺次数无关。在某些病情较重的患者中,Vacu-Cut针使用简便且疼痛发生率较低可能更具优势。