Dain S J, Adams A J
School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1990 Jan;10(1):40-5.
The Adams desaturated D-15 was designed to be administered to patients with acquired colour vision defects by simply reducing the chroma of the Munsell colours by 2 for each cap in the test. In this study, the performance of the Adams desat D-15 in the assessment of congenital colour vision deficiencies is evaluated. The standard D-15 and Adams desat D-15 tests were administered to 75 congenital red-green colour deficient subjects who had been diagnosed on the basis of their performance on the Nagel anomaloscope Mark 1. The results were analysed in terms of the directions, extent and specificity of errors and compared with the diagnosis on the Nagel anomaloscope. Of the 13 colour-deficient subjects who made no errors on the standard D-15, 1 failed the Adams desat D-15 and 2 made single crossings. No colour-deficient subject who failed the standard D-15 made anything less than a simple inversion of adjacent caps on the Adams desat D-15. The Adams desat D-15 did not perform as well as the standard D-15 in identification of the type of defect in dichromats. On the basis of these data, it is predicted that about 5% of dichromats will be mis-classified by the Adams desat D-15 whilst under 0.1% will be mis-classified by the standard D-15. However, with the anomalous trichomats, more crossings were made on the Adams desat D-15, particularly by the milder anomals, and a diagnosis was possible in more cases. Where a diagnosis was possible, it was also correct more often with the Adams desat D-15.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
亚当斯去饱和D - 15测试的设计初衷是,通过将测试中每个色帽的孟塞尔颜色的彩度简单降低2,来应用于后天性色觉缺陷患者。在本研究中,对亚当斯去饱和D - 15在评估先天性色觉缺陷方面的表现进行了评估。对75名先天性红绿色觉缺陷受试者进行了标准D - 15和亚当斯去饱和D - 15测试,这些受试者是根据他们在纳格尔色盲镜Mark 1上的表现而被诊断出来的。根据错误的方向、程度和特异性对结果进行了分析,并与纳格尔色盲镜的诊断结果进行了比较。在标准D - 15测试中没有出错的13名色觉缺陷受试者中,1名在亚当斯去饱和D - 15测试中未通过,2名出现了单次交叉。在标准D - 15测试中未通过的色觉缺陷受试者,在亚当斯去饱和D - 15测试中至少出现了相邻色帽的简单颠倒。在识别二色视者的缺陷类型方面,亚当斯去饱和D - 15的表现不如标准D - 15。根据这些数据预测,约5%的二色视者会被亚当斯去饱和D - 15误分类,而被标准D - 15误分类的比例低于0.1%。然而,对于异常三色视者,在亚当斯去饱和D - 15测试中出现了更多的交叉,尤其是症状较轻的异常者,并且在更多情况下能够做出诊断。在能够做出诊断的情况下,亚当斯去饱和D - 15的诊断正确率也更高。(摘要截选至250字)