• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么父母更愿意在侵入性产前检测中了解胎儿性别?

Why do parents prefer to know the fetal sex as part of invasive prenatal testing?

作者信息

Kooper Angelique J A, Pieters Jacqueline J P M, Eggink Alex J, Feuth Ton B, Feenstra Ilse, Wijnberger Lia D E, Rijnders Robbert J P, Quartero Rik W P, Boekkooi Peter F, van Vugt John M G, Smits Arie P T

机构信息

Department of Human Genetics, Nijmegen Medical Centre, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2012;2012:524537. doi: 10.5402/2012/524537. Epub 2012 Dec 12.

DOI:10.5402/2012/524537
PMID:23304540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3530785/
Abstract

Objectives. The aim of this study was to determine whether prospective parents, primarily referred for prenatal diagnosis to exclude Down syndrome, prefer to know the fetal sex as part of invasive testing. Methods. In this prospective study 400 pregnant women undergoing amniocentesis were invited to answer a questionnaire, including information about demographic factors, current pregnancy, and previous children. In two open-ended questions they were asked why they wanted to know the fetal sex after amniocentesis or ultrasound investigation. Scores were given for reasons that could have played a role in the wish whether or not to know the sex of their unborn child. Results. A total of 210 (52.5%) questionnaires were completed. Overall, 69.0% was interested to know the fetal sex as part of the diagnostic test result. The most important reasons were curiosity (77.8%), "just want to know" (68.0%), and "because it is possible" (66.8%). The overall knowledge of sex chromosomal disorders appeared low and did not seem to affect the parent's wish to know the fetal sex. Almost all women (96.6%) planned to have a 20-week ultrasound scan and 96.2% thought the scan to be reliable in detecting the fetal sex. A minority (28%) was willing to learn the fetal sex by ultrasound examination, whereas 65% preferred to learn the fetal sex only after the amniocentesis. Conclusion. Personal values affect the parental desire to know or not to know the fetal sex. This does not appear to be affected by invasive prenatal testing and/or genetic knowledge of sex chromosomal disorders.

摘要

目的。本研究的目的是确定主要因进行产前诊断以排除唐氏综合征而前来咨询的准父母是否希望在侵入性检测中了解胎儿性别。方法。在这项前瞻性研究中,邀请了400名接受羊膜穿刺术的孕妇回答一份问卷,问卷包括人口统计学因素、当前妊娠情况以及既往子女情况。在两个开放式问题中,询问她们在羊膜穿刺术或超声检查后为何想了解胎儿性别。对可能影响其是否希望了解未出生孩子性别的原因进行评分。结果。共完成210份(52.5%)问卷。总体而言,69.0%的人有兴趣在诊断检测结果中了解胎儿性别。最重要的原因是好奇(77.8%)、“就是想知道”(68.0%)以及“因为有可能知道”(66.8%)。对性染色体疾病的总体了解似乎较低,且似乎并未影响父母了解胎儿性别的意愿。几乎所有女性(96.6%)计划进行20周超声扫描,96.2%的人认为该扫描在检测胎儿性别方面可靠。少数人(28%)愿意通过超声检查了解胎儿性别,而65%的人更愿意仅在羊膜穿刺术后了解胎儿性别。结论。个人价值观会影响父母了解或不了解胎儿性别的意愿。这似乎不受侵入性产前检测和/或性染色体疾病的遗传知识的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a2/3530785/a52c899bb18c/ISRN.OBGYN2012-524537.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a2/3530785/46a490055f03/ISRN.OBGYN2012-524537.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a2/3530785/606a48d151ce/ISRN.OBGYN2012-524537.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a2/3530785/a52c899bb18c/ISRN.OBGYN2012-524537.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a2/3530785/46a490055f03/ISRN.OBGYN2012-524537.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a2/3530785/606a48d151ce/ISRN.OBGYN2012-524537.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a2/3530785/a52c899bb18c/ISRN.OBGYN2012-524537.003.jpg

相似文献

1
Why do parents prefer to know the fetal sex as part of invasive prenatal testing?为什么父母更愿意在侵入性产前检测中了解胎儿性别?
ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2012;2012:524537. doi: 10.5402/2012/524537. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
2
What factors are associated with parents' desire to know the sex of their unborn child?哪些因素与父母想要知道未出生孩子性别的愿望有关?
Birth. 2004 Dec;31(4):272-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00319.x.
3
4
Fetal sexing by ultrasound in the second trimester: maternal preference and professional ability.孕中期超声鉴定胎儿性别:母亲的偏好与专业能力。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Nov;8(5):318-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.08050318.x.
5
Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.单胎妊娠胎儿非整倍体的产前筛查。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Jul;33(7):736-750. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34961-1.
6
Fetal sex preference of second-trimester gravidas.孕中期孕妇的胎儿性别偏好
J Nurse Midwifery. 1993 Mar-Apr;38(2):110-3. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(93)90144-6.
7
Preference and Disclosure of Fetal Gender to Pregnant Women during Prenatal Ultrasonography in South South Nigeria.在尼日利亚南部进行产前超声检查时,孕妇对胎儿性别的偏好和披露。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2024 Apr 1;27(4):460-466. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_696_23. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
8
Why do patients decline amniocentesis? Analysis of factors influencing the decision to refuse invasive prenatal testing.为什么有些患者拒绝羊膜腔穿刺术?影响拒绝侵袭性产前检测决策的因素分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 16;18(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1812-3.
9
Do women want disclosure of fetal gender during prenatal ultrasound scan?女性希望在产前超声检查时得知胎儿性别吗?
Ann Afr Med. 2010 Jan-Mar;9(1):11-4. doi: 10.4103/1596-3519.62618.
10
Do pregnant women want to know the sex of the expected child at routine ultrasound and are they interested in sex selection?孕妇是否希望在常规超声检查中了解预期孩子的性别,以及她们是否对性别选择感兴趣?
Ups J Med Sci. 2017 Nov;122(4):254-259. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2017.1408723. Epub 2018 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Maternal Intuition of Fetal Gender.母亲对胎儿性别的直觉。
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2017 Aug 10;4(3):125-130. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1454. eCollection 2017 Summer.
2
Bovine sperm sex-selection technology in Japan.日本的牛精子性别选择技术。
Reprod Med Biol. 2018 Sep 27;18(1):17-26. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12235. eCollection 2019 Jan.
3
Decisional regret in women receiving high risk or inconclusive prenatal cell-free DNA screening results.高风险或不确定的产前游离 DNA 筛查结果对女性的决策后悔。

本文引用的文献

1
Incidental prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidies: health, behavior, and fertility.性染色体非整倍体的产前偶然诊断:健康、行为和生育能力
ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2011;2011:807106. doi: 10.5402/2011/807106. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
2
Sex chromosome trisomies in Europe: prevalence, prenatal detection and outcome of pregnancy.性染色体三体在欧洲的流行情况、产前检出率和妊娠结局。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2011 Feb;19(2):231-4. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.148. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
3
Sonographic fetal sex determination.超声检查确定胎儿性别
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Apr;33(8):1412-1418. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1519541. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
4
Do pregnant women want to know the sex of the expected child at routine ultrasound and are they interested in sex selection?孕妇是否希望在常规超声检查中了解预期孩子的性别,以及她们是否对性别选择感兴趣?
Ups J Med Sci. 2017 Nov;122(4):254-259. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2017.1408723. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2009 Jan;64(1):50-7. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e318193299b.
4
Rethinking autonomy in the context of prenatal screening decision-making.在产前筛查决策背景下重新思考自主性。
Prenat Diagn. 2008 Feb;28(2):115-20. doi: 10.1002/pd.1920.
5
How unexpected are unexpected findings in prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis? A literature review.产前细胞遗传学诊断中的意外发现有多意外?一项文献综述。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005 May 1;120(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.10.005.
6
What factors are associated with parents' desire to know the sex of their unborn child?哪些因素与父母想要知道未出生孩子性别的愿望有关?
Birth. 2004 Dec;31(4):272-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00319.x.
7
Factors influencing parental decision making in prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidy.影响性染色体非整倍体产前诊断中父母决策的因素。
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;104(1):94-101. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000128171.14081.eb.
8
Clinical applications of cell-free fetal DNA from maternal plasma.
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jan;103(1):157-64. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000103996.44503.F1.
9
Genetic counseling for sex chromosome abnormalities.性染色体异常的遗传咨询
Am J Med Genet. 2002 Jun 1;110(1):3-10. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.10391.
10
Application of fetal DNA in maternal plasma for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis.胎儿DNA在孕妇血浆中用于无创产前诊断的应用。
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2002 Jan;2(1):32-40. doi: 10.1586/14737159.2.1.32.