Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun;20(6):1918-26. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2849-6. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
Both ultrasonic coagulation (Harmonic Scalpel) (HS) and bipolar coagulation (Ligasure) (LS) are new energy devices commonly used in open thyroidectomy. This systematic review aimed at comparing the efficacy and surgical outcomes of total thyroidectomy (TT) between HS and. LS.
A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify studies comparing HS and LS. Intraoperative outcomes, surgically related complications, overall morbidity, and hospital stay were evaluated. Meta-analysis was performed using a fixed-effects model.
There were 8 studies that matched the selection criteria. Of the 963 patients who underwent TT, 433 (45.0 %) used HS (HS group) while 530 (55.0 %) used LS (LS group). Compared with LS, the HS group had significantly less volume of blood loss by 2.22 ml (95 % CI = 0.26-4.23 ml) (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.2, 95 % CI = -0.38 to -0.02) and reduced total operating time by 3.32 minutes (95 % CI = 1.62-5.03 minutes) (SMD = -0.28, 95 % CI = -0.42 to -0.15). There was no significant difference in temporary postoperative hypocalcemia (OR = 1.29, 95 % CI = 0.88-1.90), permanent postoperative hypocalcemia (OR = 1.45, 95 % CI = 0.23-9.26), temporary recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury (OR = 1.34; 95 % CI = 0.66-2.71), permanent RLN injury (OR = 1.00; 95 % CI = 0.25-4.03), hematoma (OR = 1.00; 95 % CI = 0.3-3.31), overall morbidity (OR = 1.21, 95 % CI = 0.87-1.69), and hospital stay (SMD = -0.03; 95 % CI = -0.07 to 0.01).
Compared with LS, using HS in TT significantly reduced the volume of blood loss and operating time. However, the clinical significance of these findings remained questionable because the overall mean difference appeared small. There was no significant difference in the rate of complications, overall morbidity, and hospital stay between the two devices.
超声凝固(Harmonic Scalpel)(HS)和双极电凝(Ligasure)(LS)都是常用于开放性甲状腺切除术的新型能源设备。本系统评价旨在比较 HS 和 LS 在全甲状腺切除术(TT)中的疗效和手术结果。
对比较 HS 和 LS 的文献进行系统评价。评估术中结果、与手术相关的并发症、总发病率和住院时间。使用固定效应模型进行荟萃分析。
有 8 项研究符合选择标准。在接受 TT 的 963 名患者中,433 名(45.0%)使用 HS(HS 组),530 名(55.0%)使用 LS(LS 组)。与 LS 相比,HS 组的出血量明显减少 2.22ml(95%CI=0.26-4.23ml)(标准化均数差[SMD]=-0.2,95%CI=-0.38 至-0.02),总手术时间减少 3.32 分钟(95%CI=1.62-5.03 分钟)(SMD=-0.28,95%CI=-0.42 至-0.15)。术后暂时性低钙血症(OR=1.29,95%CI=0.88-1.90)、永久性低钙血症(OR=1.45,95%CI=0.23-9.26)、暂时性喉返神经(RLN)损伤(OR=1.34;95%CI=0.66-2.71)、永久性 RLN 损伤(OR=1.00;95%CI=0.25-4.03)、血肿(OR=1.00;95%CI=0.3-3.31)、总发病率(OR=1.21,95%CI=0.87-1.69)和住院时间(SMD=-0.03;95%CI=-0.07 至 0.01)差异无统计学意义。
与 LS 相比,HS 在 TT 中可显著减少出血量和手术时间。然而,由于总体平均差异较小,这些发现的临床意义仍值得怀疑。两种设备之间的并发症发生率、总发病率和住院时间差异无统计学意义。