Pharmacometrics Research Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Box 591, SE 751 24, Uppsala, Sweden.
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2013 Apr;40(2):129-42. doi: 10.1007/s10928-012-9289-6. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
HbA1c is the most commonly used biomarker for the adequacy of glycemic management in diabetic patients and a surrogate endpoint for anti-diabetic drug approval. In spite of an empirical description for the relationship between average glucose (AG) and HbA1c concentrations, obtained from the A1c-derived average glucose (ADAG) study by Nathan et al., a model for the non-steady-state relationship is still lacking. Using data from the ADAG study, we here develop such models that utilize literature information on (patho)physiological processes and assay characteristics. The model incorporates the red blood cell (RBC) aging description, and uses prior values of the glycosylation rate constant (KG), mean RBC life-span (LS) and mean RBC precursor LS obtained from the literature. Different hypothesis were tested to explain the observed non-proportional relationship between AG and HbA1c. Both an inverse dependence of LS on AG and a non-specificity of the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program assay used could well describe the data. Both explanations have mechanistic support and could be incorporated, alone or in combination, in models allowing prediction of the time-course of HbA1c changes associated with changes in AG from, for example dietary or therapeutic interventions, and vice versa, to infer changes in AG from observed changes in HbA1c. The selection between the alternative mechanistic models require gathering of new information.
糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)是评估糖尿病患者血糖控制水平的常用生物标志物,也是抗糖尿病药物审批的替代终点。尽管 Nathan 等人的 A1c 衍生平均血糖(ADAG)研究对平均血糖(AG)和 HbA1c 浓度之间的关系进行了经验描述,但仍缺乏非稳态关系的模型。本研究利用 ADAG 研究的数据,开发了利用文献中关于(病理)生理过程和检测特征信息的模型。该模型包含了红细胞(RBC)老化的描述,并使用了文献中获得的糖化速率常数(KG)、平均 RBC 寿命(LS)和平均 RBC 前体 LS 的先验值。我们测试了不同的假设来解释 AG 和 HbA1c 之间观察到的不成比例关系。LS 与 AG 的反比关系和美国国家糖化血红蛋白标准化计划(National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program)检测的非特异性均可很好地描述数据。这两种解释都具有机制支持,可以单独或组合使用,以预测 AG 变化与 HbA1c 变化相关的时间过程,反之亦然,从观察到的 HbA1c 变化推断 AG 的变化。在替代机制模型之间的选择需要收集新的信息。