• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于药代动力学模拟的评估:优化试验持续时间以预测治疗后长期 HbA1c 的变化。

Optimization of trial duration to predict long-term HbA1c change with therapy: A pharmacometrics simulation-based evaluation.

机构信息

Pharmacometrics Research Group, Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Global Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacometrics, Lilly Research Laboratories, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2022 Nov;11(11):1443-1457. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12854. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1002/psp4.12854
PMID:35899461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9662199/
Abstract

Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is the main biomarker of diabetes drug development. However, because of its delayed turnover, trial duration is rarely shorter than 12 weeks, and being able to predict long-term HbA1c with precision using data from shorter studies would be beneficial. The feasibility of reducing study duration was therefore investigated in this study, assuming a model-based analysis. The aim was to investigate the predictive performance of 24- and 52-week extrapolations using data from up to 4, 6, 8 or 12 weeks, with six previously published pharmacometric models of HbA1c. Predictive performance was assessed through simulation-based dose-response predictions and model averaging (MA) with two hypothetical drugs. Results were consistent across the methods of assessment, with MA supporting the results derived from the model-based framework. The models using mean plasma glucose (MPG) or nonlinear fasting plasma glucose (FPG) effect, driving the HbA1c formation, showed good predictive performance despite a reduced study duration. The models, using the linear effect of FPG to drive the HbA1c formation, were sensitive to the limited amount of data in the shorter studies. The MA with bootstrap demonstrated strongly that a 4-week study duration is insufficient for precise predictions of all models. Our findings suggest that if data are analyzed with a pharmacometric model with MPG or FPG with a nonlinear effect to drive HbA1c formation, a study duration of 8 weeks is sufficient with maintained accuracy and precision of dose-response predictions.

摘要

糖化血红蛋白 (HbA1c) 是糖尿病药物开发的主要生物标志物。然而,由于其半衰期较长,试验通常很少短于 12 周,如果能够使用更短研究中的数据准确预测长期 HbA1c,将非常有益。因此,本研究假设基于模型的分析,考察了缩短研究时间的可行性。目的是使用多达 4、6、8 或 12 周的数据,调查使用六个先前发表的 HbA1c 药代动力学模型进行 24 周和 52 周外推的预测性能。通过基于模拟的剂量反应预测和两种假设药物的模型平均 (MA) 评估预测性能。评估方法的结果一致,MA 支持基于模型框架得出的结果。尽管研究时间缩短,但使用平均血浆葡萄糖 (MPG) 或非线性空腹血糖 (FPG) 效应来驱动 HbA1c 形成的模型显示出良好的预测性能。使用 FPG 的线性效应来驱动 HbA1c 形成的模型对较短研究中的有限数据较为敏感。使用 bootstrap 的 MA 强烈表明,4 周的研究时间不足以对所有模型进行精确预测。我们的研究结果表明,如果使用具有 MPG 或具有非线性效应的 FPG 来驱动 HbA1c 形成的药代动力学模型进行数据分析,8 周的研究时间是足够的,并且可以保持剂量反应预测的准确性和精密度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0894/9662199/87624b09fa98/PSP4-11-1443-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0894/9662199/fb44bf899dce/PSP4-11-1443-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0894/9662199/d3061ff26f08/PSP4-11-1443-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0894/9662199/60c8c06db72e/PSP4-11-1443-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0894/9662199/072151d46ba7/PSP4-11-1443-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0894/9662199/b3aaa3dd7350/PSP4-11-1443-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0894/9662199/87624b09fa98/PSP4-11-1443-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0894/9662199/fb44bf899dce/PSP4-11-1443-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0894/9662199/d3061ff26f08/PSP4-11-1443-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0894/9662199/60c8c06db72e/PSP4-11-1443-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0894/9662199/072151d46ba7/PSP4-11-1443-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0894/9662199/b3aaa3dd7350/PSP4-11-1443-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0894/9662199/87624b09fa98/PSP4-11-1443-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimization of trial duration to predict long-term HbA1c change with therapy: A pharmacometrics simulation-based evaluation.基于药代动力学模拟的评估:优化试验持续时间以预测治疗后长期 HbA1c 的变化。
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2022 Nov;11(11):1443-1457. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12854. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
2
Efficacy, safety, and dose-response characteristics of glipizide gastrointestinal therapeutic system on glycemic control and insulin secretion in NIDDM. Results of two multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. The Glipizide Gastrointestinal Therapeutic System Study Group.格列吡嗪胃肠道治疗系统对非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者血糖控制及胰岛素分泌的疗效、安全性和剂量反应特征。两项多中心、随机、安慰剂对照临床试验的结果。格列吡嗪胃肠道治疗系统研究组
Diabetes Care. 1997 Apr;20(4):597-606. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.4.597.
3
Evaluation of the long-term durability and glycemic control of fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin for pioglitazone in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.吡格列酮对日本2型糖尿病患者空腹血糖和糖化血红蛋白的长期耐久性及血糖控制的评估
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Mar;17(3):215-23. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0222. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
4
Short-term intensive insulin therapy could be the preferred option for new onset Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with HbA1c > 9.对于新诊断的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)>9%的 2 型糖尿病患者,短期强化胰岛素治疗可能是首选。
J Diabetes. 2017 Oct;9(10):890-893. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12581. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
5
Clinical characteristics of type 2 diabetes patients with discordance between HbA and fasting plasma glucose in the real world: An analysis of the ORBIT study.真实世界中糖化血红蛋白与空腹血糖不相符的 2 型糖尿病患者的临床特征:ORBIT 研究分析。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2018 May;34(4):e2977. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2977. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
6
Predicting steady-state HbA1c responses to sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.预测 2 型糖尿病患者接受西格列汀治疗后的稳态 HbA1c 反应。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009 Aug;11(8):813-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01058.x. Epub 2009 May 19.
7
The relationship between fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c during intensive periods of glucose control in antidiabetic therapy.在糖尿病治疗强化血糖控制期间,空腹血糖与糖化血红蛋白之间的关系。
J Theor Biol. 2014 Dec 21;363:158-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.08.020. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
8
Influence of Fasting Plasma Glucose Targets on Glycemic Variability in Chinese Participants With Type 2 Diabetes: A Post Hoc Analysis of the FPG GOAL Trial (BEYOND III).中文 2 型糖尿病患者空腹血糖目标对血糖变异性的影响:FPG GOAL 试验(BEYOND III)事后分析。
Adv Ther. 2022 Jan;39(1):421-429. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01932-2. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
9
Machine Learning to Identify Predictors of Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes: An Analysis of Target HbA1c Reduction Using Empagliflozin/Linagliptin Data.利用机器学习识别2型糖尿病血糖控制的预测因素:基于恩格列净/利格列汀数据的糖化血红蛋白目标降低分析
Pharmaceut Med. 2019 Jun;33(3):209-217. doi: 10.1007/s40290-019-00281-4.
10
Size and shape of the associations of glucose, HbA, insulin and HOMA-IR with incident type 2 diabetes: the Hoorn Study.葡萄糖、HbA1c、胰岛素和 HOMA-IR 与 2 型糖尿病发病风险的关联的大小和形状:霍恩研究。
Diabetologia. 2018 Jan;61(1):93-100. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4452-7. Epub 2017 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
A Longitudinal Multimodal Dataset of Type 1 Diabetes.1型糖尿病的纵向多模态数据集。
Sci Data. 2025 Aug 7;12(1):1379. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-05695-1.
2
Evaluation of Four Semi-Mechanistic Models for Predicting Glycemic Control With a Glucagon Receptor Antagonist in People With Type 2 Diabetes.评估四种半机制模型用于预测胰高血糖素受体拮抗剂对2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的效果
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2025 Aug;14(8):1381-1390. doi: 10.1002/psp4.70058. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
3
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry 13-year data collection and analysis: geographic distribution, financial support, research phase, duration, and disease categories.

本文引用的文献

1
Prior information for population pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis: overview and guidance with a focus on the NONMEM PRIOR subroutine.群体药代动力学和药代动力学/药效学分析的先验信息:概述及 NONMEM PRIOR 子程序重点指导
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2020 Oct;47(5):431-446. doi: 10.1007/s10928-020-09695-z. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
2
NONMEM Tutorial Part II: Estimation Methods and Advanced Examples.非房室模型(NONMEM)教程第二部分:估计方法与高级示例。
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2019 Aug;8(8):538-556. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12422. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
3
Comparison of Model Averaging and Model Selection in Dose Finding Trials Analyzed by Nonlinear Mixed Effect Models.
中国临床试验注册中心13年的数据收集与分析:地理分布、资金支持、研究阶段、持续时间和疾病类别。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Oct 12;10:1203346. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1203346. eCollection 2023.
基于非线性混合效应模型的剂量发现试验中模型平均法与模型选择法的比较。
AAPS J. 2018 Mar 29;20(3):56. doi: 10.1208/s12248-018-0205-x.
4
Comparison of Power, Prognosis, and Extrapolation Properties of Four Population Pharmacodynamic Models of HbA1c for Type 2 Diabetes.比较四种用于 2 型糖尿病患者 HbA1c 的群体药代动力学模型的效能、预后和外推性能。
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2018 May;7(5):331-341. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12290. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
5
Development and Qualification of a Drug-Disease Modeling Platform to Characterize Clinically Relevant Endpoints in Type 2 Diabetes Trials.开发和验证药物-疾病建模平台,以表征 2 型糖尿病试验中的临床相关终点。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Oct;104(4):699-708. doi: 10.1002/cpt.998. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
6
Model selection and averaging of nonlinear mixed-effect models for robust phase III dose selection.用于稳健的III期剂量选择的非线性混合效应模型的模型选择与平均法
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2017 Dec;44(6):581-597. doi: 10.1007/s10928-017-9550-0. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
7
Clinical Effectiveness of Liraglutide in Type 2 Diabetes Treatment in the Real-World Setting: A Systematic Literature Review.利拉鲁肽在2型糖尿病实际治疗中的临床疗效:系统文献综述
Diabetes Ther. 2016 Sep;7(3):411-38. doi: 10.1007/s13300-016-0180-0. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
8
Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.利拉鲁肽与2型糖尿病患者的心血管结局
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 28;375(4):311-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603827. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
9
Weight-HbA1c-insulin-glucose model for describing disease progression of type 2 diabetes.用于描述2型糖尿病疾病进展的体重-糖化血红蛋白-胰岛素-葡萄糖模型。
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2016 Jan;5(1):11-9. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12051. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
10
Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes.恩格列净:在 2 型糖尿病中的心血管结局和死亡率。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2117-28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504720. Epub 2015 Sep 17.