Division of Physiological Chemistry I, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Proteomics. 2013 Mar;13(5):723-6. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201200451.
The dynamic range of the cellular proteome approaches seven orders of magnitude-from one copy per cell to ten million copies per cell. Since a proteome's abundance distribution represents a nearly symmetric bell-shape curve on the logarithmic copy number scale, detection of half of the expressed cellular proteome, i.e. approximately 5000 proteins, should be a relatively straightforward task with modern mass spectrometric instrumentation that exhibits four orders of magnitude of the dynamic range, while deeper proteome analysis should be progressively more difficult. Indeed, metaanalysis of 15 recent papers that claim detection of >5000 protein groups reveals that the half-proteome analyses currently requires ≈5 h of chromatographic separation, while deeper analyses yield on average ≤20 new proteins per hour of chromatographic gradient. Therefore, a typical proteomics experiment consists of a "high-content" part, with the detection rate of approximately 1000 proteins/h, and a "low-content" tail with much lower rate of discovery and respectively, lower cost efficiency. This result calls for disruptive innovation in deep proteomics analysis.
细胞蛋白质组的动态范围接近七个数量级——从每个细胞一个拷贝到每个细胞一千万个拷贝。由于蛋白质组的丰度分布在对数拷贝数尺度上呈现出近乎对称的钟形曲线,因此使用现代质谱仪器检测表达细胞蛋白质组的一半,即大约 5000 种蛋白质,应该是一项相对简单的任务,因为质谱仪器具有四个数量级的动态范围,而更深入的蛋白质组分析则会越来越困难。事实上,对 15 篇最近声称检测到 >5000 个蛋白质组的论文进行荟萃分析表明,目前对半蛋白质组的分析需要 ≈5 小时的色谱分离,而更深层次的分析平均每小时的色谱梯度仅能发现 ≤20 个新蛋白质。因此,典型的蛋白质组学实验由“高含量”部分组成,检测速度约为 1000 个蛋白质/小时,以及“低含量”尾部,其发现率要低得多,相应地,成本效率也更低。这一结果要求在深度蛋白质组学分析中进行颠覆性创新。