• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较药物评估与重复经颅磁刺激镇痛在脑卒中后疼痛患者中的作用。

Comparison between pharmacologic evaluation and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced analgesia in poststroke pain patients.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

Neuromodulation. 2013 Jul-Aug;16(4):349-54; discussion 354. doi: 10.1111/ner.12019. Epub 2013 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1111/ner.12019
PMID:23311356
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It has been reported that poststroke pain has a complex pharmacologic background and that only about one-half of poststroke pain patients are sensitive to motor cortex stimulation induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS).

OBJECTIVES

The relationship between pharmacologic background and effects of rTMS of the primary motor cortex was investigated to clarify the pharmacologic basis of rTMS-induced analgesia in poststroke pain patients.

METHODS

Changes in visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain following drug challenge tests using ketamine, morphine, and thiopental were compared with the changes in VAS score following rTMS of the primary motor cortex (frequency 5 Hz, at 100% resting motor threshold, 500 pulses per session) in 20 poststroke pain patients.

RESULTS

In our drug challenge test, 10 of 20 (50%) patients in ketamine test, 7 of 20 (35%) in thiopental test, and 3 of 20 (15%) in morphine test showed more than 40% reduction of VAS score. VAS score decreased immediately after rTMS of motor cortex and persisted for 300 min (p < 0.05, Bonferroni's multiple comparisons). Comparison of the magnitude of VAS score reduction between drug challenge test and rTMS showed significant correlations with ketamine test (r = 0.503, p = 0.012), morphine test (r = 0.526, p = 0.009), and thiopental test (r = 0.609, p = 0.002) by regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

rTMS-induced VAS score reduction correlated well with morphine, ketamine, and thiopental tests. However, ketamine sensitivity was observed in more cases compared with morphine and thiopental in poststroke pain patients. We speculate that additional pharmacologic therapy using ketamine as determined on the basis of the ketamine test may be useful for enhancing the efficacy of rTMS in poststroke pain patients.

摘要

背景

据报道,卒中后疼痛具有复杂的药理学背景,只有约一半的卒中后疼痛患者对重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)引起的运动皮层刺激敏感。

目的

研究初级运动皮层的药理学背景与 rTMS 效应之间的关系,以阐明 rTMS 诱导卒中后疼痛患者镇痛的药理学基础。

方法

比较 20 例卒中后疼痛患者在接受氯胺酮、吗啡和硫喷妥钠药物挑战试验前后视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分的变化,与接受初级运动皮层 rTMS (频率 5Hz,100%静息运动阈值,每次 500 个脉冲)后的 VAS 评分变化。

结果

在我们的药物挑战试验中,氯胺酮试验中 20 例患者中有 10 例(50%),硫喷妥钠试验中 7 例(35%),吗啡试验中 3 例(15%)的 VAS 评分降低超过 40%。运动皮层 rTMS 后 VAS 评分立即下降,并持续 300 分钟(p<0.05,Bonferroni 多重比较)。药物挑战试验与 rTMS 后 VAS 评分降低幅度的比较显示,与氯胺酮试验(r=0.503,p=0.012)、吗啡试验(r=0.526,p=0.009)和硫喷妥钠试验(r=0.609,p=0.002)呈显著相关,通过回归分析。

结论

rTMS 诱导的 VAS 评分降低与吗啡、氯胺酮和硫喷妥钠试验密切相关。然而,与吗啡和硫喷妥钠相比,在卒中后疼痛患者中观察到氯胺酮的敏感性更高。我们推测,根据氯胺酮试验确定的额外的氯胺酮药理学治疗可能有助于提高 rTMS 在卒中后疼痛患者中的疗效。

相似文献

1
Comparison between pharmacologic evaluation and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced analgesia in poststroke pain patients.比较药物评估与重复经颅磁刺激镇痛在脑卒中后疼痛患者中的作用。
Neuromodulation. 2013 Jul-Aug;16(4):349-54; discussion 354. doi: 10.1111/ner.12019. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
2
Importance of Pharmacological Evaluation in the Treatment of Poststroke Pain by Spinal Cord Stimulation.脊髓刺激治疗中风后疼痛的药理学评估的重要性
Neuromodulation. 2016 Oct;19(7):744-751. doi: 10.1111/ner.12408. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
3
Efficacy of deep rTMS for neuropathic pain in the lower limb: a randomized, double-blind crossover trial of an H-coil and figure-8 coil.深度 rTMS 治疗下肢神经性疼痛的疗效:H 线圈和 8 字形线圈的随机、双盲交叉试验。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Nov;127(5):1172-1180. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.JNS16815. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
4
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation once a week induces sustainable long-term relief of central poststroke pain.每周一次的重复经颅磁刺激可诱导脑卒中后中枢性疼痛获得可持续的长期缓解。
Neuromodulation. 2015 Jun;18(4):249-54. doi: 10.1111/ner.12301. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
5
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left premotor/dorsolateral prefrontal cortex does not have analgesic effect on central poststroke pain.左侧运动前区/背外侧前额叶皮质重复经颅磁刺激对脑卒中后中枢性疼痛没有镇痛作用。
J Pain. 2014 Dec;15(12):1271-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
6
Somatosensory change and pain relief induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with central poststroke pain.重复经颅磁刺激治疗脑卒中后中枢性疼痛的体感变化与镇痛效果
Neuromodulation. 2014 Dec;17(8):731-6; discussion 736. doi: 10.1111/ner.12198. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
7
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation induced analgesia depends on N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptors.重复经颅磁刺激诱导的镇痛作用依赖于 N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸谷氨酸受体。
Pain. 2014 Mar;155(3):598-605. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.12.022. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
8
Analgesia-enhancing effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury:An fNIRS study.重复经颅磁刺激对脊髓损伤后神经性疼痛的镇痛作用:一项近红外光谱研究。
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2019;37(5):497-507. doi: 10.3233/RNN-190934.
9
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation at Different Frequencies for Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled, Randomized Trial.不同频率重复经颅磁刺激治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的双盲、假刺激随机对照试验。
Pain Physician. 2019 Jul;22(4):E303-E313.
10
Differential effect of conditioning sequences in coupling inhibitory/facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for poststroke motor recovery.在耦合抑制性/促进性重复经颅磁刺激以促进中风后运动恢复中,条件序列的差异效应
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2014 Apr;20(4):355-63. doi: 10.1111/cns.12221. Epub 2014 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for central post-stroke pain: systematic review and meta-analysis.经颅磁刺激疗法治疗中风后中枢性疼痛:系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Neurosci. 2024 Feb 14;18:1345128. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1345128. eCollection 2024.
2
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in central post-stroke pain: current status and future perspective.重复经颅磁刺激治疗中风后中枢性疼痛:现状与未来展望。
Korean J Pain. 2023 Oct 1;36(4):408-424. doi: 10.3344/kjp.23220.
3
Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Central Neuropathic Pain.
用于中枢神经性疼痛的非侵入性脑刺激
Front Mol Neurosci. 2022 May 19;15:879909. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.879909. eCollection 2022.
4
Evidence Mapping Based on Systematic Reviews of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the Motor Cortex for Neuropathic Pain.基于重复经颅磁刺激运动皮层治疗神经性疼痛系统评价的证据图谱
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Feb 16;15:743846. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.743846. eCollection 2021.
5
Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Pain Management: A Systematic Narrative Review.重复经颅磁刺激对疼痛管理的影响:一项系统的叙述性综述。
Front Neurol. 2020 Feb 18;11:114. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00114. eCollection 2020.
6
Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Clinical Pain Intensity and Experimental Pain Sensitivity Among Individuals with Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review.非侵入性脑刺激对中风后中枢性疼痛患者临床疼痛强度及实验性疼痛敏感性的影响:一项系统评价
J Pain Res. 2019 Dec 13;12:3319-3329. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S216081. eCollection 2019.
7
Non-invasive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) of the Motor Cortex for Neuropathic Pain-At the Tipping Point?用于神经性疼痛的运动皮层非侵入性经颅磁刺激(TMS)——处于临界点?
Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2013 Oct 29;4(4):e0023. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10130. eCollection 2013.