Suppr超能文献

127 例创伤性双侧额部脑挫裂伤的强化治疗与预后

Intensive management and prognosis of 127 cases with traumatic bilateral frontal contusions.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Fudan University Huashan Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2013 Dec;80(6):879-88. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.01.020. Epub 2013 Jan 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the development of edema and the possible enlargement of the hemorrhagic contusion, patients with a bifrontal contusion may deteriorate rapidly or even die as the result of central brain herniation. Therefore, close monitoring and in time treatment may be important to these patients.

METHODS

A 127 patients with bifrontal contusions were reviewed retrospectively. Among them, 63 patients accepted operations, 39 cases underwent intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, and 24 cases did not. We compared the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) for prognosis, length of osmolar therapy, and length in intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay between ICP and non-ICP groups.

RESULTS

Compared with the non-ICP operation group, there was no significant difference in Glasgow Coma Scale score in the ICP group, both at admission (average 8.62 vs. 8.91, P = 0.711) and at discharge (average 11.32 vs. 10.45, P = 0.427). However, the length of stay in the ICU was much shorter in the ICP operation group than that of the non-ICP group (15.67 ± 8.72 days vs. 25.32 ± 18.78 days, P = 0.013). Hospital stay was also shortened significantly in the ICP operation group compared with the non-ICP operation group (18.94 ± 8.92 days vs. 34.29 ± 22.64 days, P = 0.001). The length of osmolar therapy with mannitol was also decreased in the ICP operation group compared with the non-ICP group (14.11 ± 6.65 days vs. 21.84 ± 12.02, P = 0.008). However, there was no difference in mortality between two groups (5/39 vs. 4/24). We followed up 29 ICP operation patients and nineteen non-ICP operation patients using GOS 6 months later. The average GOS was 4.21 and 3.32 for the ICP and non-ICP groups respectively (P = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

ICP is one of the most important intensive types of monitoring for patients with moderate-to-severe bifrontal contusions and may be beneficial in creating a better prognosis. Intensive care and proper management are necessary to reduce stays in ICU, hospitalization, and mannitol osmolar therapy, and to improve GOS.

摘要

背景

随着水肿的发展和可能的出血性挫伤扩大,双额叶挫伤患者可能会因中央脑疝而迅速恶化甚至死亡。因此,密切监测和及时治疗对这些患者可能很重要。

方法

回顾性分析 127 例双额叶挫伤患者,其中 63 例行手术治疗,39 例行颅内压(ICP)监测,24 例行非 ICP 监测。我们比较了 ICP 组和非 ICP 组之间的格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)预后、渗透压治疗时间、重症监护病房(ICU)和住院时间。

结果

与非 ICP 手术组相比,ICP 组入院时(平均 8.62 对 8.91,P=0.711)和出院时(平均 11.32 对 10.45,P=0.427)的格拉斯哥昏迷评分无显著差异。然而,ICP 手术组 ICU 住院时间明显短于非 ICP 手术组(15.67±8.72 天对 25.32±18.78 天,P=0.013)。与非 ICP 手术组相比,ICP 手术组的住院时间也显著缩短(18.94±8.92 天对 34.29±22.64 天,P=0.001)。与非 ICP 手术组相比,ICP 手术组甘露醇渗透压治疗时间也缩短(14.11±6.65 天对 21.84±12.02 天,P=0.008)。然而,两组死亡率无差异(5/39 对 4/24)。我们对 29 例 ICP 手术患者和 19 例非 ICP 手术患者进行了 6 个月的 GOS 随访,ICP 组和非 ICP 组的平均 GOS 分别为 4.21 和 3.32(P=0.025)。

结论

ICP 是中重度双额叶挫伤患者最重要的强化监测类型之一,可能有助于改善预后。重症监护和适当的管理是必要的,以减少 ICU 入住时间、住院时间、甘露醇渗透压治疗时间,并提高 GOS。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验