Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Jul;22(7):979-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.09.013. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
Reconstruction of only the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments may restore superior-inferior (S-I) but not anterior-posterior (A-P) stability of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint. Concomitant reconstruction of both the AC and CC ligaments may more reliably restore intact biomechanical characteristics of the AC joint.
Ten matched pairs of shoulders were utilized. Five specimens underwent CC ligament reconstruction while an equal number underwent combined AC and CC ligament reconstruction utilizing an intramedullary tendon graft. Each of the reconstructions was compared with the intact contralateral control. Translational and load to failure characteristics were compared between groups.
No difference was found in S-I translation between intact specimens and CC-only reconstructions (P = .20) nor between intact specimens and AC/CC reconstructions (P = .33) at 10 Newton (N) loads. Significant differences were noted in A-P translation between intact specimens and CC-only reconstructions (P < .001) but no difference in A-P translation between intact specimens and AC/CC reconstructions (P = .34).
The A-P and S-I translational biomechanical characteristics of the AC joint were restored using the new technique described. Reconstruction of the CC ligaments only (versus AC/CC combined) led to significantly increased translational motion in the A-P plane as compared to intact control specimens.
仅重建喙锁(CC)韧带可能恢复肩锁(AC)关节的上下(S-I)稳定性,但不能恢复前后(A-P)稳定性。同时重建 AC 和 CC 韧带可能更可靠地恢复 AC 关节完整的生物力学特性。
使用了 10 对匹配的肩部。5 个标本进行了 CC 韧带重建,而数量相等的标本则使用髓内肌腱移植物进行了 AC 和 CC 韧带的联合重建。将每种重建与对侧完整的对照进行比较。在组间比较了平移和失效负荷特性。
在 10 牛顿(N)负荷下,未发现完整标本与 CC 仅重建之间的 S-I 平移差异(P =.20),也未发现完整标本与 AC/CC 重建之间的 S-I 平移差异(P =.33)。在完整标本与 CC 仅重建之间观察到 A-P 平移的显著差异(P <.001),但在完整标本与 AC/CC 重建之间观察到 A-P 平移无差异(P =.34)。
使用所描述的新技术恢复了 AC 关节的 A-P 和 S-I 平移生物力学特性。与完整对照标本相比,仅重建 CC 韧带(与 AC/CC 联合重建相比)导致 A-P 平面的平移运动显著增加。