Shin Sang-Jin, Campbell Sean, Scott Jonathan, McGarry Michelle H, Lee Thay Q
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, VA Long Beach Healthcare System (09/151), 5901 East 7th Street, Long Beach, CA, 90822, USA.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Sep;22(9):2216-22. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2569-x. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
The purpose of this study was to introduce a novel surgical technique for simultaneous anatomic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments using a single tendon graft and to compare its biomechanical characteristics to those of a coracoid cerclage reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments.
Six matched pairs of human acromioclavicular joints with an average age of 54.8 ± 7.8 years were used. One shoulder from each pair received the single tendon acromioclavicular-coracoclavicular reconstruction; the contralateral shoulder received the coracoid cerclage reconstruction. Bovine extensor tendon was used for both techniques. The single tendon acromioclavicular-coracoclavicular reconstruction technique provided anatomic restoration of the two coracoclavicular ligaments and the superior and inferior acromioclavicular ligaments simultaneously using one coracoid hole, one acromion hole, and two clavicular holes with interference screws. Anterior-posterior and superior-inferior translations were quantified for all specimens before and after reconstruction, followed by load to failure testing.
Following coracoid cerclage reconstruction, total anterior-posterior translation was significantly greater than intact (10.0 ± 5.7 mm; p = 0.008). Following single tendon acromioclavicular-coracoclavicular reconstruction, there was no significant difference in anterior-posterior translation compared to intact (-1.6 ± 2.2 mm; n.s.). The coracoid cerclage technique demonstrated significantly greater anterior-posterior translation than the single tendon acromioclavicular-coracoclavicular technique (p = 0.007). Both techniques restored superior-inferior translation to the intact condition (n.s.). Ultimate load, deformation at ultimate load, and energy absorbed at ultimate load were significantly greater after acromioclavicular-coracoclavicular reconstruction than after coracoid cerclage reconstruction (p < 0.05).
This novel single tendon anatomic acromioclavicular-coracoclavicular reconstruction provided greater stability and stronger load to failure characteristics than the isolated coracoid cerclage reconstruction. A simultaneous acromioclavicular-coracoclavicular reconstruction technique using a single free tendon graft provided anatomic reconstruction of the conoid, trapezoid, and superior and inferior acromioclavicular ligaments and may reduce postoperative subluxation.
本研究的目的是介绍一种使用单根肌腱移植物同时对肩锁关节和喙锁韧带进行解剖重建的新型手术技术,并将其生物力学特性与喙突环扎重建喙锁韧带的技术进行比较。
使用6对匹配的人类肩锁关节,平均年龄为54.8±7.8岁。每对中的一个肩部接受单根肌腱肩锁-喙锁重建;对侧肩部接受喙突环扎重建。两种技术均使用牛伸肌腱。单根肌腱肩锁-喙锁重建技术通过一个喙突孔、一个肩峰孔和两个锁骨孔并使用干涉螺钉,同时对两条喙锁韧带以及肩锁关节的上、下韧带进行解剖修复。对所有标本在重建前后进行前后和上下平移的量化,随后进行破坏载荷测试。
在喙突环扎重建后,总的前后平移明显大于完整状态(10.0±5.7mm;p=0.008)。在单根肌腱肩锁-喙锁重建后,与完整状态相比,前后平移无显著差异(-1.6±2.2mm;无统计学意义)。喙突环扎技术显示出比单根肌腱肩锁-喙锁技术更大的前后平移(p=0.007)。两种技术均将上下平移恢复到了完整状态(无统计学意义)。肩锁-喙锁重建后的极限载荷、极限载荷下的变形以及极限载荷下吸收的能量均明显大于喙突环扎重建后(p<0.05)。
这种新型的单根肌腱解剖学肩锁-喙锁重建比单独的喙突环扎重建提供了更大稳定性和更强的破坏载荷特性。使用单根游离肌腱移植物的同时肩锁-喙锁重建技术对锥状韧带、梯形韧带以及肩锁关节的上、下韧带进行了解剖重建,并可能减少术后半脱位。