• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Statistical conclusion validity of rehabilitation research. A quantitative analysis.

作者信息

Ottenbacher K J, Barrett K A

机构信息

School of Health Related Professions, State University of New York, Buffalo 14214.

出版信息

Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1990 Apr;69(2):102-7. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199004000-00011.

DOI:10.1097/00002060-199004000-00011
PMID:2331338
Abstract

The findings of 100 data-based studies exploring the effectiveness of rehabilitation procedures were reviewed and analyzed. The statistical conclusion validity was determined by computing post hoc power coefficients for the statistical hypotheses tests included in the review studies. The data analysis revealed that the median power to detect a small effect size in the studiesreviewed was 0.08. The median power to detect medium and large effect sizes was 0.26 and 0.56, respectively. The results suggest the possibility of a high rate of type II experimental errors in the rehabilitation research. A type II error represents a false-negative conclusion and occurs when a researcher supports a null hypothesis that was false and should have been rejected.

摘要

相似文献

1
Statistical conclusion validity of rehabilitation research. A quantitative analysis.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1990 Apr;69(2):102-7. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199004000-00011.
2
How to detect effects: statistical power and evidence-based practice in occupational therapy research.
Am J Occup Ther. 1999 Mar-Apr;53(2):181-8. doi: 10.5014/ajot.53.2.181.
3
Statistical conclusion validity. Multiple inferences in rehabilitation research.统计结论效度。康复研究中的多重推断。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1991 Dec;70(6):317-22.
4
Novel Effect Size Interpretation Guidelines and an Evaluation of Statistical Power in Rehabilitation Research.新型效应量解释指南及康复研究中统计功效的评估。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Dec;101(12):2219-2226. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.02.017. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
5
Satisfied conclusion validity of early intervention research with handicapped children.
Except Child. 1989 Apr;55(6):534-40. doi: 10.1177/001440298905500607.
6
Statistical conclusion validity and type IV errors in rehabilitation research.康复研究中的统计结论效度与IV型错误
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992 Feb;73(2):121-5.
7
Low power, type II errors, and other statistical problems in recent cardiovascular research.近期心血管研究中的低效能、II类错误及其他统计学问题。
Am J Physiol. 1997 Jul;273(1 Pt 2):H487-93. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1997.273.1.H487.
8
Confounds of insensitivity and blind luck: statistical conclusion validity in stroke rehabilitation clinical trials.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Jun;74(6):559-65. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(93)90152-z.
9
Why rehabilitation research does not work (as well as we think it should).为何康复研究并未取得预期效果(不如我们认为它应有的那样)。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Feb;76(2):123-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80021-2.
10
Empowering research: statistical power in general practice research.助力研究:全科医学研究中的统计效能
Fam Pract. 1997 Aug;14(4):324-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/14.4.324.