• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估指(趾)纹印痕的清晰度。

Assessing the clarity of friction ridge impressions.

机构信息

Noblis, 3150 Fairview Park Drive, Falls Church, VA 22043, USA.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int. 2013 Mar 10;226(1-3):106-17. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.12.015. Epub 2013 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.12.015
PMID:23313600
Abstract

The ability of friction ridge examiners to correctly discern and make use of the ridges and associated features in finger or palm impressions is limited by clarity. The clarity of an impression relates to the examiner's confidence that the presence, absence, and attributes of features can be correctly discerned. Despite the importance of clarity in the examination process, there have not previously been standard methods for assessing clarity in friction ridge impressions. We introduce a process for annotation, analysis, and interchange of friction ridge clarity information that can be applied to latent or exemplar impressions. This paper: (1) describes a method for evaluating the clarity of friction ridge impressions by using color-coded annotations that can be used by examiners or automated systems; (2) discusses algorithms for overall clarity metrics based on manual or automated clarity annotation; and (3) defines a method of quantifying the correspondence of clarity when comparing a pair of friction ridge images, based on clarity annotation and resulting metrics. Different uses of this approach include examiner interchange of data, quality assurance, metrics, and as an aid in automated fingerprint matching.

摘要

摩擦力检验员正确识别和利用指纹或掌纹中的嵴纹和相关特征的能力受到清晰度的限制。印痕的清晰度与检验员对特征的存在、缺失和属性能够正确识别的信心有关。尽管在检查过程中清晰度很重要,但以前没有评估摩擦力印痕清晰度的标准方法。我们引入了一种用于注释、分析和交换摩擦力清晰度信息的过程,该过程可应用于潜在或示例印痕。本文:(1)描述了一种通过使用彩色编码注释来评估摩擦力印痕清晰度的方法,检验员或自动化系统可以使用这些注释;(2)讨论了基于手动或自动清晰度注释的整体清晰度指标的算法;(3)定义了一种基于清晰度注释和由此产生的指标来量化比较一对摩擦力图像时清晰度一致性的方法。这种方法的不同用途包括检验员数据交换、质量保证、指标以及在自动指纹匹配中作为辅助工具。

相似文献

1
Assessing the clarity of friction ridge impressions.评估指(趾)纹印痕的清晰度。
Forensic Sci Int. 2013 Mar 10;226(1-3):106-17. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.12.015. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
2
The permanence of friction ridge skin and persistence of friction ridge skin and impressions: A comprehensive review and new results.摩擦嵴皮肤的永久性以及摩擦嵴皮肤和印痕的持久性:一项全面综述及新成果。
Forensic Sci Int. 2019 Apr;297:111-131. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.046. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
3
Latent fingerprint matching.潜伏指纹匹配。
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2011 Jan;33(1):88-100. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2010.59.
4
Understanding the sufficiency of information for latent fingerprint value determinations.理解潜在指纹价值判断所需信息量的充分性。
Forensic Sci Int. 2013 Jul 10;230(1-3):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.01.012. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
5
Fingerprint warping using ridge curve correspondences.利用脊线曲线对应关系进行指纹变形
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2006 Jan;28(1):19-30. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2006.11.
6
Examining and expanding the friction ridge value decision.检验和拓展指纹价值决策。
Forensic Sci Int. 2020 Sep;314:110408. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110408. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
7
On relative distortion in fingerprint comparison.
Forensic Sci Int. 2014 Nov;244:78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.08.007. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
8
An objective fingerprint quality-grading system.客观指纹质量分级系统。
Forensic Sci Int. 2013 Sep 10;231(1-3):204-7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
9
Curved-region-based ridge frequency estimation and curved Gabor filters for fingerprint image enhancement.基于脊线频率估计和弯曲方向 Gabor 滤波器的指纹图像增强。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2012 Apr;21(4):2220-7. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2011.2170696. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
10
Identification of palm print using dermatoglyphics analysis and detection system.利用皮纹分析与检测系统识别掌纹。
Med Eng Phys. 2005 Apr;27(3):229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.10.012.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital matching of palatal rugae patterns for forensic identification in edentulous denture wearers.无牙义齿佩戴者腭皱襞模式的数字匹配用于法医鉴定
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2025 Mar;21(1):157-164. doi: 10.1007/s12024-024-00852-1. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
2
Probabilistic Fingermark Quality Assessment with Quality Region Localisation.基于质量区域定位的概率指印质量评估。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Apr 15;23(8):4006. doi: 10.3390/s23084006.
3
Probabilistic reporting and algorithms in forensic science: Stakeholder perspectives within the American criminal justice system.
法医学中的概率报告与算法:美国刑事司法系统内利益相关者的观点
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2022 Feb 12;4:100220. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100220. eCollection 2022.
4
Characterizing missed identifications and errors in latent fingerprint comparisons using eye-tracking data.利用眼动追踪数据刻画潜在指纹比对中的漏认和错误。
PLoS One. 2021 May 24;16(5):e0251674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251674. eCollection 2021.
5
Implementation of algorithms in pattern & impression evidence: A responsible and practical roadmap.模式与痕迹证据中算法的应用:一份负责任且实用的路线图。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 Feb 18;3:100142. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100142. eCollection 2021.
6
Accuracy and reliability of feature selection by Chinese fingerprint examiners.中国指纹鉴定人员进行特征选择的准确性和可靠性。
Forensic Sci Res. 2017 Sep 20;2(4):203-209. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2017.1375449. eCollection 2017.
7
Data on the interexaminer variation of minutia markup on latent fingerprints.
Data Brief. 2016 May 4;8:158-90. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.04.068. eCollection 2016 Sep.
8
Fingerprint identification: advances since the 2009 National Research Council report.指纹识别:自2009年美国国家研究委员会报告以来的进展
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Aug 5;370(1674). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0259.
9
Measuring what latent fingerprint examiners consider sufficient information for individualization determinations.衡量潜在指纹鉴定人员认为足以进行个体识别判定的信息。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 5;9(11):e110179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110179. eCollection 2014.