Laboratory of Haematology and Blood Bank Unit, ‘Attiko’ University General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 1 Rimini Street, Athens 12462, Greece.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013 Jul;51(7):1535-42. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0562.
The aim was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of a single plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) PCT and IL-6 measurement in discriminating septic from non-septic causes of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and forecasting clinical outcomes.
One hundred patients were enrolled within 48 h of ALI/ARDS recognition. Demographic, clinical data, severity indices were recorded and PCT and IL-6 concentrations were measured in plasma and BALF.
Plasma PCT and IL-6 values were significantly higher in septic compared to non-septic individuals (p=0.001 and 0.0005, respectively), while there were no differences in their respective BALF values. As far as identification of septic vs. non-septic ARDS is concerned, the comparison of the areas under the curves favored PCT vs. IL-6 [0.88, (95% CI 0.81-0.95) vs. 0.71, (95% CI 0.60-0.81); χ(2)=9.04, p=0.003]. A plasma PCT level of 0.815 ng/mL was associated with 74.1% sensitivity and 97.6% specificity in identifying septic ARDS cases; this corresponded to a diagnostic odds ratio value of 116. Linear regression multivariable analysis disclosed a significant relation of plasma PCT with SOFA score in septic ARDS patients (p<0.001), while neither BALF PCT nor IL-6 levels were associated with clinical outcome.
Early plasma - but not BALF - PCT concentrations can discriminate between septic and non-septic ARDS causes and are associated with the severity of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in septic ARDS patients. However, neither plasma or BALF IL-6 levels nor BALF PCT levels carry any prognostic potential. A single plasma PCT value higher than 0.815 ng/mL makes a non-septic cause of ARDS highly unlikely.
本研究旨在评估单一血浆和支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)降钙素原(PCT)和白细胞介素-6(IL-6)测量在鉴别急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的感染性和非感染性病因以及预测临床结局方面的临床效用。
在 ALI/ARDS 确诊后 48 小时内,共纳入 100 例患者。记录患者的人口统计学、临床数据和严重程度指数,并测量血浆和 BALF 中的 PCT 和 IL-6 浓度。
与非感染性个体相比,感染性个体的血浆 PCT 和 IL-6 值明显更高(p=0.001 和 0.0005),而 BALF 中的 PCT 和 IL-6 值无差异。就鉴别感染性与非感染性 ARDS 而言,曲线下面积的比较更倾向于 PCT 而非 IL-6 [0.88(95%置信区间 0.81-0.95)与 0.71(95%置信区间 0.60-0.81);χ(2)=9.04,p=0.003]。血浆 PCT 水平为 0.815ng/mL 时,鉴别感染性 ARDS 病例的敏感性为 74.1%,特异性为 97.6%;这对应于诊断优势比为 116。多元线性回归分析显示,血浆 PCT 与感染性 ARDS 患者的 SOFA 评分之间存在显著相关性(p<0.001),而 BALF PCT 或 IL-6 水平与临床结局均无相关性。
早期血浆而非 BALF-PCT 浓度可鉴别感染性与非感染性 ARDS 病因,并与感染性 ARDS 患者多器官功能障碍综合征的严重程度相关。然而,血浆或 BALF-IL-6 水平或 BALF-PCT 水平均不具有预后预测价值。血浆 PCT 值高于 0.815ng/mL 时,ARDS 由非感染性病因引起的可能性极低。