Suppr超能文献

脉氧仪是基本工具还是又一个干扰因素?脉氧仪在现代麻醉护理中的作用。

Is pulse oximetry an essential tool or just another distraction? The role of the pulse oximeter in modern anesthesia care.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208051, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Monit Comput. 2013 Jun;27(3):235-42. doi: 10.1007/s10877-013-9428-7. Epub 2013 Jan 12.

Abstract

Since the discovery of anesthetic agents, patient monitoring has been considered one of the core responsibilities of the anesthesiologist. As depicted in Robert Hinckley's famous painting, The First Operation with Ether, one observes William Thomas Green Morton carefully watching over his patient. Since its founding in 1905, 'Vigilance' has been the motto of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). Over a hundred years have passed, and one would think we would be clear regarding what we are watching for and how we should be watching. On the contrary, the introduction of new technology and outcome research is requiring us to re-examine our fundamental assumptions regarding what is and what is not important in the care of the patient. A vast majority of anesthesiologists would refuse to proceed with an anesthetic without the presence of a pulse oximeter. On the other hand, outcome studies have failed to demonstrate an improvement in patient care with their use. For that matter, it can be argued that outcome studies have yet to demonstrate an unambiguous role for any monitor of any type (i.e. blood pressure cuff or ECG), as outcome studies may fail to capture rare events. Because of the increased safety that has been attributed to pulse oximetry, it is unlikely that further studies can or will be conducted. As we enter a new era of clinical monitoring, with an emphasis on noninvasive cardiovascular monitoring, it might be of benefit to examine the role of the pulse oximeter in clinical care. This article reviews the available evidence for pulse oximetry. Further, it discusses contemporary issues, events, and perceptions that may help to explain how and why pulse oximetry may have been adopted as a standard of care despite the lack of supportive. Lastly, it discusses less obvious benefits of pulse oximetry that may have further implications on the future of anesthesia care and perhaps even automated anesthesia.

摘要

自发现麻醉剂以来,患者监测一直被认为是麻醉师的核心职责之一。正如罗伯特·欣克利(Robert Hinckley)的著名画作《第一次乙醚手术》所描绘的那样,可以看到威廉·托马斯·格林·莫顿(William Thomas Green Morton)仔细观察着他的病人。自 1905 年成立以来,“警惕”一直是美国麻醉师学会(ASA)的座右铭。一百多年过去了,人们本以为我们会清楚地知道我们在观察什么,以及我们应该如何观察。但事实恰恰相反,新技术和结果研究的引入要求我们重新审视我们关于患者护理中什么是重要的和什么是不重要的基本假设。绝大多数麻醉师在没有脉搏血氧仪的情况下都不会进行麻醉。另一方面,结果研究未能证明其使用可以改善患者的护理。就此而言,可以说,结果研究尚未证明任何类型的监测器(即血压袖带或心电图)具有明确的作用,因为结果研究可能无法捕捉到罕见事件。由于脉搏血氧仪带来的安全性提高,不太可能进一步开展研究。随着我们进入一个以非侵入性心血管监测为重点的临床监测新时代,检查脉搏血氧仪在临床护理中的作用可能会有所裨益。本文回顾了脉搏血氧仪的现有证据。此外,它还讨论了当代的问题、事件和观念,这些可能有助于解释为什么尽管缺乏支持,脉搏血氧仪仍被采用为护理标准。最后,它还讨论了脉搏血氧仪不太明显的益处,这些益处可能会对未来的麻醉护理产生影响,甚至可能会对自动化麻醉产生影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验