医生绩效评估：新体系的开发与影响。

Doctor performance assessment: development and impact of a new system.

机构信息

IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands ; Department of Educational Research and Development, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Perspect Med Educ. 2012 May;1(2):98-100. doi: 10.1007/s40037-012-0009-0. Epub 2012 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1007/s40037-012-0009-0

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3540388/

Abstract

Karlijn Overeem, general practitioner and researcher, defended her thesis on 15 November 2011. The thesis concerns the development and implementation of a performance assessment system for medical specialists (consultants) in Dutch hospitals. Besides the use of multisource feedback, the assessments consist of a portfolio and an assessment interview with a trained colleague. The thesis comprises: a review, two qualitative studies and three quantitative studies.

摘要

卡琳·奥弗瑞姆（Karlijn Overeem）是一名全科医生和研究员，她于 2011 年 11 月 15 日进行了论文答辩。她的论文研究了荷兰医院专科医生（顾问）绩效评估系统的开发和实施，该评估系统除了使用多源反馈外，还包括一份档案和与一位受过培训的同事进行评估面谈。该论文包含：一篇文献综述、两项定性研究和三项定量研究。

相似文献

1

Doctor performance assessment: development and impact of a new system.医生绩效评估：新体系的开发与影响。

Perspect Med Educ. 2012 May;1(2):98-100. doi: 10.1007/s40037-012-0009-0. Epub 2012 Apr 11.

2

Improving the utility of multisource feedback for medical consultants in a tertiary hospital: a study of the psychometric properties of a survey tool.提高三级医院医学顾问多源反馈的效用：一项关于调查工具心理测量特性的研究

Aust Health Rev. 2019 Jan;43(6):717-723. doi: 10.1071/AH17219.

3

Multisource feedback questionnaires in appraisal and for revalidation: a qualitative study in UK general practice.多源反馈问卷在评估和再认证中的应用：英国普通实践中的定性研究。

Br J Gen Pract. 2012 May;62(598):e314-21. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X641429.

4

Three methods of multi-source feedback compared: a plea for narrative comments and coworkers' perspectives.三种多源反馈方法比较：呼吁使用叙述性评价和同事视角。

Med Teach. 2010;32(2):141-7. doi: 10.3109/01421590903144128.

5

Factors predicting doctors' reporting of performance change in response to multisource feedback.预测医生对多源反馈中绩效变化的报告的因素。

BMC Med Educ. 2012 Jul 10;12:52. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-52.

6

Self-other agreement in multisource feedback: the influence of doctor and rater group characteristics.多源反馈中的自我与他人评价一致性：医生和评价者群体特征的影响

J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2013 Winter;33(1):14-23. doi: 10.1002/chp.21162.

7

Factors associated with variability in the assessment of UK doctors' professionalism: analysis of survey results.与英国医生专业精神评估变异性相关的因素：调查结果分析。

BMJ. 2011 Oct 27;343:d6212. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6212.

8

Multisource feedback in evaluating the performance of doctors: the example of the UK General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.多源反馈评价医生绩效：以英国医学总会患者和同事调查问卷为例。

Acad Med. 2012 Dec;87(12):1668-78. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182724cc0.

9

Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理：对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。

JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.

10

How do physicians assess their family physician colleagues' performance?: creating a rubric to inform assessment and feedback.医生如何评估他们的家庭医生同事的表现？：创建一个用于指导评估和反馈的评分标准。

J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2011 Spring;31(2):87-94. doi: 10.1002/chp.20111.

引用本文的文献

1

Designing a system for performance appraisal: balancing physicians' accountability and professional development.设计绩效评估系统：平衡医生的问责制和专业发展。

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 12;21(1):800. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06818-1.

2

Feasibility, quality and validity of narrative multisource feedback in postgraduate training: a mixed-method study.叙事多源反馈在研究生培训中的可行性、质量和有效性：一项混合方法研究。

BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 28;11(7):e047019. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047019.

3

Clinical performance feedback and quality improvement opportunities for perioperative physicians.围手术期医生的临床绩效反馈与质量改进机会

Adv Med Educ Pract. 2014 May 3;5:115-23. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S62165. eCollection 2014.

4

PME aiming for quality, originality and peer recognition.PME追求质量、原创性和同行认可。

Perspect Med Educ. 2012 May;1(2):53-5. doi: 10.1007/s40037-012-0015-2. Epub 2012 May 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。