• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种不同教学形式对一篇剧本一致性测试得分和可靠性的影响。

Effects of two different instructional formats on scores and reliability of a script concordance test.

机构信息

School of Medical Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Perspect Med Educ. 2012 Aug;1(3):119-28. doi: 10.1007/s40037-012-0017-0. Epub 2012 Aug 21.

DOI:10.1007/s40037-012-0017-0
PMID:23316468
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3540344/
Abstract

The script concordance test (SCT) is designed to assess clinical reasoning by adapting the likelihood of a case diagnosis, based on provided new information. In the standard instructions students are asked to exclude alternative diagnoses they have in mind when answering the questions, but it might be more authentic to include these. Fifty-nine final-year medical students completed an SCT. Twenty-nine were asked to take their differential diagnosis into account (adapted instructions). Thirty students were asked not to consider other diagnoses (standard instructions). All participants were asked to indicate for each question whether they were confused answering it with the given instructions ('confusion indication'). Mean score of the test with the adapted instructions was 81.5 (SD 3.8) and of the test with the standard instructions 82.9 (SD 5.0) (p = 0.220). Cronbach's alpha was 0.39 for the adapted instructions and 0.66 for the standard instructions. The mean number of confusion indications was 4.2 (SD 4.4) per student for the adapted instructions and 16.7 (SD 28.5) for the standard instructions (p = 0.139). Our attempt to improve SCTs reliability by modifying the instructions did not lead to a higher alpha; therefore we do not recommend this change in the instructional format.

摘要

脚本一致性测试(SCT)旨在通过根据提供的新信息来调整病例诊断的可能性来评估临床推理能力。在标准说明中,要求学生在回答问题时排除他们心中的其他诊断,但包括这些可能更真实。59 名医学专业的最后一年学生完成了 SCT。29 名学生被要求考虑他们的鉴别诊断(适应说明)。30 名学生被要求不考虑其他诊断(标准说明)。所有参与者都被要求在每个问题上表示他们在给定说明下回答该问题时是否感到困惑(“困惑指示”)。适应说明的测试平均得分为 81.5(SD 3.8),标准说明的测试平均得分为 82.9(SD 5.0)(p=0.220)。适应说明的 Cronbach 的 alpha 为 0.39,标准说明的 Cronbach 的 alpha 为 0.66。适应说明的每个学生的困惑指示平均数为 4.2(SD 4.4),标准说明的每个学生的困惑指示平均数为 16.7(SD 28.5)(p=0.139)。我们试图通过修改说明来提高 SCT 的可靠性,但这并没有导致更高的 alpha;因此,我们不建议在教学格式上进行此更改。

相似文献

1
Effects of two different instructional formats on scores and reliability of a script concordance test.两种不同教学形式对一篇剧本一致性测试得分和可靠性的影响。
Perspect Med Educ. 2012 Aug;1(3):119-28. doi: 10.1007/s40037-012-0017-0. Epub 2012 Aug 21.
2
Validation of undergraduate medical student script concordance test (SCT) scores on the clinical assessment of the acute abdomen.本科医学生急性腹痛临床评估脚本一致性测试(SCT)分数的验证
BMC Surg. 2016 Aug 17;16(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0173-y.
3
Evaluating clinical reasoning in first year DPT students using a script concordance test.运用脚本一致性测验评价第一年物理治疗专业学生的临床推理能力。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 22;24(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05281-w.
4
Assessing clinical reasoning skills using Script Concordance Test (SCT) and extended matching questions (EMQs): A pilot for urology trainees.使用脚本一致性测试(SCT)和扩展匹配题(EMQ)评估临床推理能力:泌尿外科实习生的一项试点研究
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2019 Jan;7(1):7-13. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2019.41038.
5
Analysing clinical reasoning characteristics using a combined methods approach.采用综合方法分析临床推理特征。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Oct 29;13:144. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-144.
6
Assessing clinical reasoning in optometry using the script concordance test.使用脚本一致性测试评估验光临床推理能力。
Clin Exp Optom. 2016 May;99(3):280-6. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12354. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
7
Creating Clinical Reasoning Assessment Tools in Different Languages: Adaptation of the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Script Concordance Test to Japanese.创建不同语言的临床推理评估工具:将儿科急诊医学脚本一致性测试改编为日语版。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 7;8:765489. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.765489. eCollection 2021.
8
The script concordance test for clinical reasoning: re-examining its utility and potential weakness.临床推理的脚本一致性测试:重新审视其效用和潜在弱点。
Med Educ. 2014 Nov;48(11):1069-77. doi: 10.1111/medu.12514.
9
Developing Script Concordance Test Items in Otolaryngology to Improve Clinical Reasoning Skills: Validation using Consensus Analysis and Psychometrics.开发耳鼻喉科脚本一致性测试项目以提高临床推理能力:使用共识分析和心理测量学进行验证
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2023 Apr-Jun;13(2):64-69. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_604_22. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
10
Are script concordance tests suitable for the assessment of undergraduate students? A multicenter comparative study.脚本一致性测试适合评估本科生吗?一项多中心比较研究。
Rev Med Interne. 2021 Apr;42(4):243-250. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
The script concordance test: an adequate tool to assess clinical reasoning?脚本一致性测试:评估临床推理的合适工具?
Perspect Med Educ. 2018 Jun;7(3):145-146. doi: 10.1007/s40037-018-0437-6.
2
Accuracy of script concordance tests in fourth-year medical students.脚本一致性测试在四年级医学生中的准确性。
Int J Med Educ. 2017 Feb 25;8:63-69. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5898.2f91.
3
Nothing is as practical as a good theory.没有什么比一个好理论更实用了。
Perspect Med Educ. 2012 Aug;1(3):101-3. doi: 10.1007/s40037-012-0022-3. Epub 2012 Aug 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Commentary: The response process validity of a script concordance test item.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012 Mar;17(1):7-9; discussion 11-3. doi: 10.1007/s10459-011-9325-0. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
2
Assessment of clinical reasoning: A Script Concordance test designed for pre-clinical medical students.临床推理评估:专为医预学生设计的脚本一致性测试。
Med Teach. 2011;33(6):472-7. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.531157.
3
Evaluation of clinical reasoning in basic emergencies using a script concordance test.运用脚本一致性测试评估基础急救中的临床推理能力。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Dec 15;74(10):194. doi: 10.5688/aj7410194.
4
Script concordance testing: a review of published validity evidence.脚本一致性测试:已发表有效性证据的回顾。
Med Educ. 2011 Apr;45(4):329-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03863.x.
5
Poorly performing physicians: does the Script Concordance Test detect bad clinical reasoning?表现不佳的医生:脚本一致性测试能检测出糟糕的临床推理吗?
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2010 Summer;30(3):161-6. doi: 10.1002/chp.20076.
6
Teaching clinical reasoning: case-based and coached.临床推理教学:基于案例和辅导式。
Acad Med. 2010 Jul;85(7):1118-24. doi: 10.1097/acm.0b013e3181d5dd0d.
7
Assessment of intraoperative judgment during gynecologic surgery using the Script Concordance Test.采用剧本一致性测试评估妇科手术中的术中判断。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;203(3):240.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.010. Epub 2010 May 21.
8
Assessing clinical reasoning in pediatric emergency medicine: validity evidence for a Script Concordance Test.评估儿科急诊医学中的临床推理:一份脚本一致性测试的效度证据
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 May;53(5):647-52. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.07.024. Epub 2008 Aug 22.
9
Script concordance tests: guidelines for construction.脚本一致性测试:构建指南。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 May 6;8:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-18.
10
Is the script concordance test a valid instrument for assessment of intraoperative decision-making skills?脚本一致性测试是评估术中决策技能的有效工具吗?
Am J Surg. 2007 Feb;193(2):248-51. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.10.012.