• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

凭经验管理驼鹿狩猎量。

Managing moose harvests by the seat of your pants.

作者信息

Boyce Mark S, Baxter Peter W J, Possingham Hugh P

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2E9, Canada.

出版信息

Theor Popul Biol. 2012 Dec;82(4):340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2012.03.002.

DOI:10.1016/j.tpb.2012.03.002
PMID:23316496
Abstract

Moose populations are managed for sustainable yield balanced against costs caused by damage to forestry or agriculture and collisions with vehicles. Optimal harvests can be calculated based on a structured population model driven by data on abundance and the composition of bulls, cows, and calves obtained by aerial-survey monitoring during winter. Quotas are established by the respective government agency and licenses are issued to hunters to harvest an animal of specified age or sex during the following autumn. Because the cost of aerial monitoring is high, we use a Management Strategy Evaluation to evaluate the costs and benefits of periodic aerial surveys in the context of moose management. Our on-the-fly "seat of your pants" alternative to independent monitoring is management based solely on the kill of moose by hunters, which is usually sufficient to alert the manager to declines in moose abundance that warrant adjustments to harvest strategies. Harvests are relatively cheap to monitor; therefore, data can be obtained each year facilitating annual adjustments to quotas. Other sources of "cheap" monitoring data such as records of the number of moose seen by hunters while hunting also might be obtained, and may provide further useful insight into population abundance, structure and health. Because conservation dollars are usually limited, the high cost of aerial surveys is difficult to justify when alternative methods exist.

摘要

驼鹿种群的管理目标是实现可持续产量,同时平衡因对林业或农业造成损害以及与车辆碰撞而产生的成本。可以根据一个结构化的种群模型来计算最佳捕获量,该模型由冬季通过空中调查监测获得的有关驼鹿数量以及成年雄鹿、成年雌鹿和幼鹿组成的数据驱动。各自的政府机构会设定配额,并向猎人发放许可证,以便他们在接下来的秋季捕获特定年龄或性别的驼鹿。由于空中监测成本高昂,我们采用管理策略评估方法,在驼鹿管理的背景下评估定期空中调查的成本和效益。我们临时采用的、不依赖独立监测的替代方法是仅基于猎人捕杀驼鹿的情况进行管理,这通常足以提醒管理人员注意到驼鹿数量的下降,从而有必要调整捕获策略。监测捕获情况相对成本较低;因此,每年都能获取数据,便于每年调整配额。还可能获取其他“低成本”监测数据来源,例如猎人在狩猎时看到的驼鹿数量记录,这些数据可能会提供有关种群数量、结构和健康状况的进一步有用见解。由于保护资金通常有限,当存在替代方法时,空中调查的高成本就难以说得通了。

相似文献

1
Managing moose harvests by the seat of your pants.凭经验管理驼鹿狩猎量。
Theor Popul Biol. 2012 Dec;82(4):340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2012.03.002.
2
Patterns and causes of demographic variation in a harvested moose population: evidence for the effects of climate and density-dependent drivers.有蹄类动物种群数量变化的模式和原因:气候和密度制约因素影响的证据。
J Anim Ecol. 2011 Nov;80(6):1288-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01875.x. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
3
Factors promoting hunting groups' sustainable harvest of moose in a co-management system.促进狩猎群体在共管系统中可持续收获驼鹿的因素。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 29;13(1):21076. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48348-2.
4
The costs and benefits of a migratory species under different management schemes.不同管理方案下迁徙物种的成本与收益。
J Environ Manage. 2005 Jul;76(2):167-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.01.016. Epub 2005 Apr 21.
5
Effects of trophy hunting on lion and leopard populations in Tanzania.坦桑尼亚狩猎奖杯对狮子和豹子数量的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2011 Feb;25(1):142-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01576.x. Epub 2010 Sep 2.
6
Management of indigenous North American deer at the end of the 20th century in relation to large predators and primary production.20世纪末北美本土鹿类与大型食肉动物及初级生产相关的管理
Acta Vet Hung. 1999;47(1):1-16. doi: 10.1556/AVet.47.1999.1.1.
7
Resource management cycles and the sustainability of harvested wildlife populations.资源管理周期与狩猎野生动物种群的可持续性。
Science. 2010 May 14;328(5980):903-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1185802.
8
Microbial contamination of moose (Alces alces) and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) carcasses harvested by hunters.猎人猎获的驼鹿(Alces alces)和白尾鹿(Odocoileus virginianus)尸体的微生物污染。
Food Microbiol. 2019 Apr;78:82-88. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
9
Hunters and hunting across indigenous and colonist communities at the forest-agriculture interface: an ethnozoological study from the Peruvian Amazon.在森林-农业交界地区的原住民和殖民者社区中的猎人及狩猎活动:来自秘鲁亚马逊地区的民族动物学研究。
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2018 Aug 10;14(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13002-018-0247-2.
10
Unexplained bacterial meat spoilage during the moose hunting in northern Norway - a review of cases 2008-2021.在挪威北部狩猎驼鹿期间出现的不明原因的细菌性肉类腐败- 2008-2021 年病例回顾。
Acta Vet Scand. 2023 Jul 3;65(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13028-023-00683-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Sustainable elk harvests in Alberta with increasing predator populations.阿尔伯塔省在增加捕食者数量的情况下可持续地收获麋鹿。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 26;17(10):e0269407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269407. eCollection 2022.
2
Linking forest management to moose population trends: The role of the nutritional landscape.将森林管理与驼鹿种群趋势联系起来:营养景观的作用。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 16;14(7):e0219128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219128. eCollection 2019.
3
Undermining subsistence: Barren-ground caribou in a "tragedy of open access".
破坏生计:“公地悲剧”中的北方驯鹿
Sci Adv. 2018 Feb 28;4(2):e1701611. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1701611. eCollection 2018 Feb.
4
Wildlife in the cloud: a new approach for engaging stakeholders in wildlife management.云端野生动物:让利益相关者参与野生动物管理的新方法。
Ambio. 2015 Nov;44 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):550-6. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0706-0.
5
Data-poor management of African lion hunting using a relative index of abundance.采用相对丰度指数对非洲狮狩猎进行数据匮乏管理。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jan 7;111(1):539-43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219615110. Epub 2013 Dec 16.