• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种抗菌漱口水对封闭容器中储存牙刷消毒的有效性:通过DNA棋盘法和培养进行的随机临床研究

Effectiveness of three antimicrobial mouthrinses on the disinfection of toothbrushes stored in closed containers: a randomized clinical investigation by DNA Checkerboard and Culture.

作者信息

do Nascimento Cássio, Sorgini Maíra Balero, Pita Murillo Sucena, Fernandes Flávio Henrique Carriço Nogueira, Calefi Paulo Linares, Watanabe Evandro, Pedrazzi Vinícius

机构信息

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Gerodontology. 2014 Sep;31(3):227-36. doi: 10.1111/ger.12035. Epub 2013 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1111/ger.12035
PMID:23316683
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this in vivo study was to evaluate the efficacy of three antimicrobial solutions on the disinfection of toothbrushes after storage in closed containers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen healthy subjects were enrolled in this randomized cross-over clinical investigation. The study was conducted in four phases, in which mouthrinses (chlorhexidine gluconate-based or cetilpiridinium-based) and sterile tap water (control group) were used to individually store used toothbrushes in closed containers during 7 days of toothbrushing. Five toothbrushes were used as negative control for bacterial colonisation before contact with oral cavity. Conventional culture and DNA Checkerboard hybridization were used to detect bacterial contamination on the toothbrushes. Subsequently, the number of bacterial species on the bristles was estimated by the DNA Checkerboard method.

RESULTS

One toothbrush presented bacterial contamination in the negative control test. Both culture and DNA Checkerboard showed positive signals of bacterial contamination in the toothbrushes with no differences in the frequency of detection. The control group showed higher total bacterial counts when compared with the mouthrinse groups. Porphyromonas gingivalis had the highest bacterial count followed by Parvimonas micra.

CONCLUSION

Culture and DNA Checkerboard showed positive signals of bacterial contamination. Mouthrinses that contains 0.12% of chlorhexidine gluconate were more effective in reducing bacterial colonisation on the toothbrushes.

摘要

目的

本体内研究旨在评估三种抗菌溶液对封闭容器中储存后的牙刷消毒效果。

材料与方法

16名健康受试者参与了这项随机交叉临床研究。研究分四个阶段进行,在此期间,在为期7天的刷牙过程中,分别使用漱口水(葡萄糖酸洗必泰或西吡氯铵)和无菌自来水(对照组)将用过的牙刷单独储存在封闭容器中。五支牙刷在接触口腔前用作细菌定植的阴性对照。采用传统培养和DNA棋盘杂交法检测牙刷上的细菌污染情况。随后,通过DNA棋盘法估算刷毛上的细菌种类数量。

结果

在阴性对照试验中,有一支牙刷出现细菌污染。培养法和DNA棋盘杂交法均显示牙刷上有细菌污染的阳性信号,检测频率无差异。与漱口水组相比,对照组的细菌总数更高。牙龈卟啉单胞菌的细菌数量最高,其次是微小单胞菌。

结论

培养法和DNA棋盘杂交法均显示有细菌污染的阳性信号。含0.12%葡萄糖酸洗必泰的漱口水在减少牙刷上的细菌定植方面更有效。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of three antimicrobial mouthrinses on the disinfection of toothbrushes stored in closed containers: a randomized clinical investigation by DNA Checkerboard and Culture.三种抗菌漱口水对封闭容器中储存牙刷消毒的有效性:通过DNA棋盘法和培养进行的随机临床研究
Gerodontology. 2014 Sep;31(3):227-36. doi: 10.1111/ger.12035. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
2
Genomic identification and quantification of microbial species adhering to toothbrush bristles after disinfection: A cross-over study.消毒后附着在牙刷刷毛上的微生物种类的基因组鉴定与定量:一项交叉研究。
Arch Oral Biol. 2015 Jul;60(7):1039-47. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.03.012. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
3
Microbial diversity of the supra- and subgingival biofilm of healthy individuals after brushing with chlorhexidine- or silver-coated toothbrush bristles.使用含氯己定或银涂层刷毛牙刷刷牙后健康个体龈上和龈下生物膜的微生物多样性
Can J Microbiol. 2015 Feb;61(2):112-23. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2014-0565. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
4
Antimicrobial spray for toothbrush disinfection: an in vivo evaluation.用于牙刷消毒的抗菌喷雾:一项体内评估。
Quintessence Int. 2005 Nov-Dec;36(10):812-6.
5
Antimicrobial efficacy of various disinfecting solutions in reducing the contamination of the toothbrush -- a comparative study.各种消毒溶液在减少牙刷污染方面的抗菌效果——一项对比研究。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2009;7(2):137-45.
6
The efficacy of chlorhexidine spray vs mouthwash in the microbial contamination of child toothbrushes.洗必泰喷雾与漱口水对儿童牙刷微生物污染的功效比较
J Dent Child (Chic). 2007 Sep-Dec;74(3):177-81.
7
A microbiological assessment of the oral hygiene of 24-72-month-old kindergarten children and disinfection of their toothbrushes.对 24-72 个月大的幼儿园儿童口腔卫生状况的微生物学评估及牙刷消毒。
BMC Oral Health. 2014 Aug 2;14:94. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-94.
8
Evaluation of the contamination and disinfection methods of toothbrushes used by 24- to 48-month-old children.24至48个月大儿童使用的牙刷的污染及消毒方法评估
J Dent Child (Chic). 2006 Sep-Dec;73(3):152-8.
9
Microbial contamination of toothbrushes and their decontamination.牙刷的微生物污染及其去污处理
Pediatr Dent. 2000 Sep-Oct;22(5):381-4.
10
Efficacy of manual and powered toothbrushes (II). Effect on microbiological parameters.手动牙刷和电动牙刷的功效(二)。对微生物参数的影响。
J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Oct;28(10):947-54. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.028010947.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacies of 0.2% Chlorhexidine and 4% Tulsi Extract in the Decontamination of Child Toothbrushes: An Observational Analytical Study.0.2%氯己定和4%罗勒提取物对儿童牙刷去污抗菌效果的比较评价:一项观察性分析研究
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022 Jan 29;12(1):85-92. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_245_21. eCollection 2022 Jan-Feb.
2
Bacterial colonization of a power-driven water flosser during regular use. A proof-of-principle study.电动冲牙器在常规使用过程中的细菌定植。原理验证研究。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021 Oct;7(5):656-663. doi: 10.1002/cre2.393. Epub 2021 May 26.
3
Toothbrush microbiomes feature a meeting ground for human oral and environmental microbiota.
牙刷微生物组是人类口腔和环境微生物群的交汇点。
Microbiome. 2021 Jan 31;9(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00983-x.
4
Efficacy of two mouth rinse sprays in inhibiting growth on toothbrush bristles.两种漱口水喷雾剂抑制牙刷刷毛上细菌生长的效果。
Saudi Dent J. 2018 Oct;30(4):365-372. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Aug 4.