Suppr超能文献

0.2%氯己定和4%罗勒提取物对儿童牙刷去污抗菌效果的比较评价:一项观察性分析研究

Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacies of 0.2% Chlorhexidine and 4% Tulsi Extract in the Decontamination of Child Toothbrushes: An Observational Analytical Study.

作者信息

Nair Lekshmy S R, Soman Anandaraj, George Sageena, Jose Deepak, Sain Shaniya, Salim Shiad

机构信息

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, PMS College of Dental Science and Research, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, PMS College of Dental Science and Research, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.

出版信息

J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022 Jan 29;12(1):85-92. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_245_21. eCollection 2022 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 0.2% chlorhexidine and 4% tulsi extract as toothbrush decontaminants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of 100 children, who attended the outpatient unit of Department of Pediatric dentistry, 81 children, who satisfied all the inclusion criteria were subjected to systematic sampling, after arranging them in the alphabetical order and were grouped into three. The first child came under Group I, second under Group II, third under Group III, fourth one again under Group I, and so on till the 81st child. In the baseline phase, the children were provided precoded toothbrushes and toothpastes and instructed to place those brushes to be put after use, in single-use glasses. After obtaining the baseline value of colony count, the participants of Group I was given 0.2% chlorhexidine, Group II was given 4% tulsi extract, and distilled water for Group III, to be used as toothbrush decontaminants for 5 days. The toothbrushes were then collected back, and were subjected to microbial analysis. Statistical analysis was performed by using Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Mann-Whitney test with < 0.05.

RESULTS

All test solutions, 0.2% chlorhexidine and 4% tulsi extract, except for distilled water, showed a statistically significant reduction of count. There was no statistical difference between the efficacies of 4% tulsi extract and 0.2% chlorhexidine, although the latter showed a better reduction.

CONCLUSION

Tulsi extract may well be a perfect replacement to chlorhexidine for reducing the count in the child toothbrushes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估0.2%洗必泰溶液和4%罗勒提取物作为牙刷消毒剂的效果。

材料与方法

在小儿牙科门诊就诊的100名儿童中,81名符合所有纳入标准的儿童按字母顺序排列后进行系统抽样,并分为三组。第一个孩子归入第一组,第二个归入第二组,第三个归入第三组,第四个再次归入第一组,依此类推,直到第81个孩子。在基线阶段,为孩子们提供预先编码的牙刷和牙膏,并指导他们将使用后的牙刷放在一次性杯子里。在获得菌落计数的基线值后,第一组参与者使用0.2%洗必泰溶液,第二组使用4%罗勒提取物,第三组使用蒸馏水作为牙刷消毒剂,为期5天。然后将牙刷收回并进行微生物分析。采用Kruskal-Wallis单因素方差分析和Mann-Whitney检验进行统计分析,P<0.05为有统计学意义。

结果

除蒸馏水外,所有测试溶液,即0.2%洗必泰溶液和4%罗勒提取物,均显示菌落计数有统计学意义的减少。4%罗勒提取物和0.2%洗必泰溶液的效果之间没有统计学差异,尽管后者的减少效果更好。

结论

罗勒提取物很可能是洗必泰的理想替代品,可用于减少儿童牙刷上的菌落计数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a2b/8896584/3fb332080ce1/JISPCD-12-85-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验