Suppr超能文献

产时聚合酶链反应检测B族链球菌定植情况

Intrapartum polymerase chain reaction for detection of group B streptococcus colonisation.

作者信息

Abdelazim Ibrahim A

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Jun;53(3):236-42. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12030. Epub 2013 Jan 15.

Abstract

AIMS

Lower vaginal swabs were collected to compare the intrapartum polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test to the standard antepartum culture for detection of group B streptococcus (GBS) colonisation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four hundred and forty-five pregnant women with documented antepartum GBS cultures, who did not receive either antepartum or intrapartum antibiotics, were included in this prospective study. At the time of delivery and before the intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP), double swabs were collected, one of the swab was used in the GBS molecular-based (PCR) test and the other was processed for GBS culture in Ahmadi Hospital Clinical Laboratory. Neonates were examined after delivery to diagnose GBS sepsis, and using intrapartum GBS culture as gold standard test; the intrapartum PCR test was compared to the antepartum culture.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of antepartum culture to diagnose GBS colonisation were 73 & 95.5%, respectively, compared with 98.3% sensitivity & 99% specificity for intrapartum PCR test (P > 0.05). Although the intrapartum PCR test was more accurate (98.8%) for detection of GBS colonisation than antepartum culture (90%), its accuracy was significantly different. The neonatal GBS sepsis was significantly related to positive intrapartum cultures, and intrapartum PCR tests, but was not related to positive antepartum cultures (the IAP to the antepartum GBS-positive mothers reduces GBS sepsis of their neonates).

DISCUSSION

The intrapartum PCR test is an accurate bedside test and it has the potential to be used as intrapartum screening for GBS colonisation allowing appropriate management of mothers and neonates.

摘要

目的

采集阴道下段拭子,比较产时聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测与标准产前培养用于检测B族链球菌(GBS)定植的情况。

材料与方法

本前瞻性研究纳入了445例有产前GBS培养记录、未接受产前或产时抗生素治疗的孕妇。在分娩时且在进行产时抗生素预防(IAP)之前,采集双份拭子,其中一份用于基于GBS分子检测(PCR),另一份在艾哈迈迪医院临床实验室进行GBS培养。分娩后对新生儿进行检查以诊断GBS败血症,并将产时GBS培养作为金标准检测;将产时PCR检测与产前培养进行比较。

结果

产前培养诊断GBS定植的敏感性和特异性分别为73%和95.5%,而产时PCR检测的敏感性为98.3%,特异性为99%(P>0.05)。尽管产时PCR检测在检测GBS定植方面比产前培养更准确(98.8%对90%),但其准确性差异有统计学意义。新生儿GBS败血症与产时培养阳性和产时PCR检测阳性显著相关,但与产前培养阳性无关(对产前GBS阳性母亲进行IAP可降低其新生儿的GBS败血症)。

讨论

产时PCR检测是一种准确的床旁检测,有潜力用作GBS定植的产时筛查,从而对母亲和新生儿进行适当管理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验