Nijmegen Centre for Evidence Based Practice, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Transplantation. 2012 Jun 27;93(12):1196-211. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318256a45f.
Deciding about the organ donation of one's brain-dead beloved often occurs in an unexpected and delicate situation. We explored the decision making of the relatives of potential brain-dead donors, its evaluation, and the factors influencing decision making.
We used the integrative review method. Our search included 10 databases. Inclusion criteria were presence of the donation request or the subsequent decision process. Three authors independently assessed the eligibility of identified articles.
Content analysis of 70 included articles led to three themes: decision, evaluation, and support. We extracted results and recommendations concerning these three themes. The timing of the request and understandable information influence the decision. The relatives evaluate their decision differently: in case of refusal, approximately one third regret their decision, and in case of consent, approximately one tenth mention regret. The relatives are often ambivalent about their values (protection, altruism, and respect) and the deceased's wishes, not wanting additional suffering either for their beloved or for themselves. Support is mainly focused on increasing consent rates and less on satisfaction with the decision.
Evaluation of decision making by the relatives of potential brain-dead donors reveals possibilities for improving the decision process. Special skills of the requester, attention to the circumstances, and unconditional support for the relatives might prevent the relatives' regret about refusal and unnecessary loss of organs. We hypothesize that support in exploring the relatives' values and the deceased's wishes can lead to stable decisions. This hypothesis deserves further investigation.
在意外和微妙的情况下,经常需要对脑死亡亲人的器官捐献做出决定。本研究旨在探讨潜在脑死亡供者亲属的决策过程、评价和影响决策的因素。
采用综合评价法。我们检索了 10 个数据库,纳入标准为存在捐献请求或随后的决策过程。三位作者独立评估了所识别文章的资格。
对 70 篇纳入文章的内容分析产生了三个主题:决策、评价和支持。我们提取了与这三个主题相关的结果和建议。请求的时机和可理解的信息影响决策。亲属对自己的决定有不同的评价:拒绝时,约三分之一的人后悔自己的决定,同意时,约十分之一的人表示后悔。亲属对自己的价值观(保护、利他主义和尊重)和死者的意愿往往感到矛盾,既不想让亲人受苦,也不想让自己受苦。支持主要集中在提高同意率上,而对决策的满意度关注较少。
对潜在脑死亡供者亲属决策的评价揭示了改进决策过程的可能性。请求者的特殊技能、对情况的关注以及对亲属的无条件支持,可以防止亲属因拒绝而后悔和不必要的器官丧失。我们假设支持亲属探索价值观和死者意愿可以做出稳定的决策。这一假设值得进一步研究。