Sobral School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Avenida Comandante Maurocélio Rocha Ponte, 100 - CEP 62,042-280, Sobral, CE, Brazil.
BMC Nephrol. 2013 Jan 15;14:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-14-12.
Several aspects linked to social are involved in the onset of depressive feelings. We aimed to find out if social adaptability and substance abuse predict depression among end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD).
We included 145 ESRD patients undergoing HD. Social adaptability was estimated by the Social Adaptability Index (SAI). Substance abuse was defined according to SAI. We screened for depression by applying the 20-item version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. A score ≥ 24 classified the patients as depressed. Comparisons between depressed and non-depressed patients were carried out and logistic regression was performed to test gender, age, total SAI, SAI without the substance abuse item, only the substance abuse score and substance abuse as a categorical variable (yes/no) as predictors of depression.
There were 36 (24.8%) depressed patients. There were no differences regarding demographic and laboratory data between the depressed and non-depressed patients. Mean SAI among depressed and non-depressed patients was, respectively, 6.1 ± 1.6 vs. 6.2 ± 1.9 (p=0.901). The percentage of patients with or without substance abuse among depressed patients was, respectively, 13.8% vs. 13.9% (p=1.000). Gender, age, total SAI, SAI without the substance abuse item, only the substance abuse score and substance abuse as a categorical variable did not predict depression.
Social adaptability and substance abuse did not predict depression in HD patients. We propose that aspects related to socioeconomic status not comprised in SAI items should be ruled out as predictors of depression.
与社会相关的多个方面都与抑郁情绪的发生有关。我们旨在探讨社会适应能力和物质滥用是否可以预测接受血液透析(HD)的终末期肾病(ESRD)患者的抑郁情况。
我们纳入了 145 名接受 HD 的 ESRD 患者。社会适应能力通过社会适应能力指数(SAI)进行评估。物质滥用根据 SAI 进行定义。我们通过应用 20 项版本的流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)对抑郁进行筛查。得分≥24 分的患者被诊断为抑郁。对抑郁患者和非抑郁患者进行比较,并进行逻辑回归分析,以检验性别、年龄、总 SAI、不包括物质滥用项目的 SAI、仅物质滥用得分以及物质滥用作为分类变量(是/否)是否为抑郁的预测因素。
有 36 名(24.8%)患者抑郁。抑郁患者和非抑郁患者在人口统计学和实验室数据方面没有差异。抑郁患者和非抑郁患者的平均 SAI 分别为 6.1±1.6 和 6.2±1.9(p=0.901)。抑郁患者中存在或不存在物质滥用的患者比例分别为 13.8%和 13.9%(p=1.000)。性别、年龄、总 SAI、不包括物质滥用项目的 SAI、仅物质滥用得分以及物质滥用作为分类变量均不能预测抑郁。
社会适应能力和物质滥用不能预测 HD 患者的抑郁。我们提出,SAI 项目中未包含的与社会经济地位相关的方面应排除在抑郁预测因素之外。