Institute of Haematology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Rd, Camperdown, NSW, Australia 2050.
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(2):170-84. doi: 10.1007/s11864-012-0223-3.
Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a unique subtype of acute myeloid leukemia that is characterized by distinct clinical, morphological, cytogenetic, and molecular abnormalities. It is associated with a striking risk of early hemorrhagic death due to disseminated intravascular coagulation and hyperfibrinolysis. The prognosis of APL has improved dramatically following the introduction of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and its combination with anthracycline-based chemotherapy during induction and consolidation. Patients with high-risk APL, defined by a white cell count >10 × 10(9)/L at diagnosis, also appear to benefit from the addition of intermediate- or high-dose cytarabine during consolidation. Arsenic trioxide (ATO) has proved to be even more effective than ATRA as a single agent, and is now routinely used for the treatment of the 20%-30% of patients who manifest disease relapse after initial treatment with ATRA and chemotherapy. ATO has a toxicity profile that differs considerably from that of both ATRA and cytotoxic chemotherapy, and accordingly presents its own specific challenges during treatment. Optimizing a strategy for the incorporation of ATO into initial therapy is currently the focus of several cooperative group trials, with an emphasis on minimizing or even eradicating the use of chemotherapy. ATRA plus ATO without chemotherapy appears to be adequate during induction and consolidation for patients with standard-risk APL, but triple therapy that includes limited anthracycline or gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) during induction is required for high-risk APL. Uncertainty still exists regarding the minimum amount of chemotherapy and number of consolidation cycles necessary, the optimal scheduling of ATO, and the potential utility of oral ATO administration. Although prolonged oral maintenance therapy is usually included in most current APL treatment protocols, its value remains controversial, and the superior anti-leukemic efficacy of ATO-based therapy may facilitate its elimination in the future.
急性早幼粒细胞白血病(APL)是一种独特的急性髓系白血病亚型,其特征是具有明显的临床、形态学、细胞遗传学和分子异常。由于弥散性血管内凝血和纤维蛋白溶解亢进,它与早期出血性死亡的风险显著相关。在诱导和巩固治疗中引入全反式维甲酸(ATRA)及其与蒽环类药物联合化疗后,APL 的预后有了显著改善。高白细胞计数(诊断时>10×10(9)/L)的高危 APL 患者在巩固治疗期间似乎也受益于中等或高剂量阿糖胞苷的加入。三氧化二砷(ATO)作为单一药物的疗效甚至优于 ATRA,现已常规用于治疗初始 ATRA 和化疗治疗后疾病复发的 20%-30%的患者。ATO 的毒性谱与 ATRA 和细胞毒性化疗有很大的不同,因此在治疗过程中会带来自身特有的挑战。目前,几项合作组试验的重点是优化将 ATO 纳入初始治疗的策略,强调尽量减少甚至消除化疗的使用。对于标准风险的 APL 患者,ATRA 加 ATO 无需化疗即可在诱导和巩固期间使用,但高危 APL 患者需要在诱导期进行包括有限蒽环类药物或吉妥珠单抗奥佐米星(GO)的三联治疗。关于化疗的最小剂量和巩固周期的数量、ATO 的最佳调度以及口服 ATO 给药的潜在效用,仍然存在不确定性。尽管大多数当前的 APL 治疗方案通常包括延长的口服维持治疗,但它的价值仍存在争议,并且基于 ATO 的治疗的优越抗白血病疗效可能使其在未来被消除。