• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝切除术后肝细胞癌甲胎蛋白表达的七种不同分期系统的评估

Evaluation of seven different staging systems for alpha-fetoprotein expression in hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy.

作者信息

Zhou Jianguo, Yan Tao, Bi Xinyu, Zhao Hong, Huang Zhen, Zhang Yefan, Li Yuan, Feng Li, Wang Jing, Cai Jianqiang

机构信息

Department of Abdominal Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.

出版信息

Tumour Biol. 2013 Apr;34(2):1061-70. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-0646-x. Epub 2013 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1007/s13277-013-0646-x
PMID:23322323
Abstract

Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) represents the most important biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to identify the optimal staging system to predict the survival of AFP-negative and AFP-positive patients. This study analyzed the data of 431 AFP-negative HCC patients who had previously undergone surgery and 471 AFP-positive HCC candidates. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival estimates were plotted, and the P values were assessed using log-rank tests. The Akaike information criterion (AIC) was calculated using the results of a Cox's regression to compare the overall assessment of the seven different staging systems. The AFP-positive group displayed characteristics of poor tumor biological behavior (tumor multiplicity [P = 0.032], low grade differentiation [P = 0.000] and carcinoma cell embolus [P = 0.031]), poor liver function (Child-Pugh B classification [P = 0.003], abnormal prothrombin time activity [P = 0.037] and moderate/severe cirrhosis [P = 0.000]) and increased operative difficulties (transfusion; P = 0.001). TNM7th staging showed the lowest AIC value (1,279.528) for the AFP-negative group, while the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system revealed the lowest AIC value (1,991.233) for the AFP-positive group. In conclusion, among the seven favorable staging systems, BCLC staging was superior for the AFP-positive group, while the TNM7th was a more appropriate staging model for the AFP-negative group.

摘要

甲胎蛋白(AFP)是肝细胞癌(HCC)最重要的生物标志物。本研究旨在确定预测AFP阴性和AFP阳性患者生存率的最佳分期系统。本研究分析了431例先前接受过手术的AFP阴性HCC患者和471例AFP阳性HCC患者的数据。绘制了Kaplan-Meier(K-M)生存估计值,并使用对数秩检验评估P值。使用Cox回归结果计算赤池信息准则(AIC),以比较七种不同分期系统的总体评估。AFP阳性组表现出肿瘤生物学行为差(肿瘤多灶性[P = 0.032]、低分化[P = 0.000]和癌细胞栓子[P = 0.031])、肝功能差(Child-Pugh B级分类[P = 0.003]、凝血酶原时间活性异常[P = 0.037]和中度/重度肝硬化[P = 0.000])以及手术难度增加(输血;P = 0.0)的特征。TNM第7版分期在AFP阴性组中显示出最低的AIC值(1279.528),而巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)分期系统在AFP阳性组中显示出最低的AIC值(1991.233)。总之,在七种有利的分期系统中,BCLC分期对AFP阳性组更优,而TNM第7版对AFP阴性组是更合适的分期模型。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of seven different staging systems for alpha-fetoprotein expression in hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy.肝切除术后肝细胞癌甲胎蛋白表达的七种不同分期系统的评估
Tumour Biol. 2013 Apr;34(2):1061-70. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-0646-x. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
2
Survival outcomes of hepatectomy for stage B Hepatocellular carcinoma in the BCLC classification.巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期 B 期肝癌行肝切除术的生存结局。
World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Aug 22;15(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1229-x.
3
Prognosis evaluation in alpha-fetoprotein negative hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy: comparison of five staging systems.甲胎蛋白阴性肝癌肝切除术后预后评估:五种分期系统比较。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010 Aug;36(8):718-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.05.022. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
4
External validation of a simplified BCLC staging system for early hepatocellular carcinoma.简化 BCLC 分期系统用于早期肝细胞癌的外部验证。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug;39(8):850-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 May 29.
5
Prognostic roles of preoperative α-fetoprotein and des-γ-carboxy prothrombin in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.术前甲胎蛋白和脱γ-羧基凝血酶原在肝细胞癌患者中的预后作用
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr 28;21(16):4933-45. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.4933.
6
Prognostic Significance of Preoperative Serum Alpha- fetoprotein in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Correlation with Clinicopathological Factors: a Single-center Experience from China.术前血清甲胎蛋白在肝细胞癌中的预后意义及其与临床病理因素的相关性:来自中国的单中心经验
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(10):4421-7. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.10.4421.
7
Evaluation of alpha-fetoprotein staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma in noncirrhotic patients.非肝硬化患者肝细胞癌甲胎蛋白分期系统的评估
Am Surg. 2013 Jul;79(7):716-22.
8
Importance of SALL4 in the development and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.SALL4在肝细胞癌发生发展及预后中的重要性。
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar 7;22(9):2837-43. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i9.2837.
9
Ascites and alpha-fetoprotein improve prognostic performance of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging.腹水和甲胎蛋白可改善巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期的预后性能。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 14;21(18):5654-62. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5654.
10
PIVKA-II combined with tumor burden score to predict long-term outcomes of AFP-negative hepatocellular carcinoma patients after liver resection.异常凝血酶原(PIVKA-II)联合肿瘤负荷评分预测 AFP 阴性肝癌患者肝切除术后的长期预后。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jan;13(1):e6835. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6835. Epub 2023 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
New Blood Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of AFP-Negative Hepatocellular Carcinoma.用于诊断甲胎蛋白阴性肝细胞癌的新型血液生物标志物
Front Oncol. 2020 Aug 14;10:1316. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01316. eCollection 2020.
2
Staging systems for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current status and future perspectives.肝细胞癌的分期系统:现状与未来展望
World J Hepatol. 2015 Mar 27;7(3):406-24. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i3.406.
3
Prognosis evaluation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy: comparison of BCLC, TNM and Hangzhou criteria staging systems.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer (2011 edition).原发性肝癌诊疗规范(2011年版)
Chin Clin Oncol. 2012 Sep;1(1):10. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3865.2012.07.01.
2
Prevention of chronic HBV infection induced hepatocellular carcinoma development by using antiplatelet drugs.使用抗血小板药物预防慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染诱发的肝细胞癌发展
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2012 Dec;1(1):57-8. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2012.10.09.
3
Increasing incidence in liver cancer in Canada, 1972-2006: Age-period-cohort analysis.
肝细胞癌患者肝切除术后的预后评估:BCLC、TNM和杭州标准分期系统的比较
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 18;9(8):e103228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103228. eCollection 2014.
加拿大 1972-2006 年肝癌发病率的上升:年龄-时期-队列分析。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2011 Dec;2(4):223-31. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2011.024.
4
Applicability of BCLC stage for prognostic stratification in comparison with other staging systems: single centre experience from long-term clinical outcomes of 1717 treatment-naïve patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.BCLC 分期在预后分层方面的适用性与其他分期系统的比较:来自 1717 例未经治疗的肝细胞癌患者长期临床结局的单中心经验。
Liver Int. 2012 Aug;32(7):1120-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2012.02811.x. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
5
Global cancer statistics.全球癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
6
A comparison of prognosis between patients with hepatitis B and C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing resection surgery.比较乙型肝炎和丙型肝炎病毒相关性肝细胞癌患者行切除术的预后。
World J Surg. 2011 Apr;35(4):858-67. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0928-z.
7
The challenge of prognosis and staging for hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌的预后和分期挑战。
Oncologist. 2010;15 Suppl 4:23-33. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-S4-23.
8
A new staging system for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with six existing staging systems in a large Chinese cohort.一种新的可切除肝细胞癌分期系统:与中国大样本队列中 6 种现有分期系统的比较。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2011 May;137(5):739-50. doi: 10.1007/s00432-010-0935-3. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
9
Selecting an optimal staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of 5 currently used prognostic models.选择最优的肝细胞癌分期系统:比较目前使用的 5 种预后模型。
Cancer. 2010 Jun 15;116(12):3006-14. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25044.
10
Prognosis evaluation in alpha-fetoprotein negative hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy: comparison of five staging systems.甲胎蛋白阴性肝癌肝切除术后预后评估:五种分期系统比较。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010 Aug;36(8):718-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.05.022. Epub 2010 Jun 9.