Suppr超能文献

非侵入性冠状动脉 CT 血管造影术的诊断准确性研究的方法学质量:QUADAS(系统评价中包含的诊断准确性研究质量评估)项目对敏感性和特异性的影响。

Methodological quality of diagnostic accuracy studies on non-invasive coronary CT angiography: influence of QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies included in systematic reviews) items on sensitivity and specificity.

机构信息

Charité Medical School, Department of Radiology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2013 Jun;23(6):1603-22. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2763-0. Epub 2013 Jan 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the methodological quality of diagnostic accuracy studies on coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography using the QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies included in systematic reviews) tool.

METHODS

Each QUADAS item was individually defined to adapt it to the special requirements of studies on coronary CT angiography. Two independent investigators analysed 118 studies using 12 QUADAS items. Meta-regression and pooled analyses were performed to identify possible effects of methodological quality items on estimates of diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

The overall methodological quality of coronary CT studies was merely moderate. They fulfilled a median of 7.5 out of 12 items. Only 9 of the 118 studies fulfilled more than 75 % of possible QUADAS items. One QUADAS item ("Uninterpretable Results") showed a significant influence (P = 0.02) on estimates of diagnostic accuracy with "no fulfilment" increasing specificity from 86 to 90 %. Furthermore, pooled analysis revealed that each QUADAS item that is not fulfilled has the potential to change estimates of diagnostic accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

The methodological quality of studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive coronary CT is only moderate and was found to affect the sensitivity and specificity. An improvement is highly desirable because good methodology is crucial for adequately assessing imaging technologies.

KEY POINTS

• Good methodological quality is a basic requirement in diagnostic accuracy studies. • Most coronary CT angiography studies have only been of moderate design quality. • Weak methodological quality will affect the sensitivity and specificity. • No improvement in methodological quality was observed over time. • Authors should consider the QUADAS checklist when undertaking accuracy studies.

摘要

目的

使用 QUADAS(系统评价中包含的诊断准确性研究的质量评估)工具评估冠状动脉 CT 血管造影术(CTA)的诊断准确性研究的方法学质量。

方法

将 QUADAS 的每个项目单独定义,以适应冠状动脉 CTA 研究的特殊要求。两名独立的研究者使用 12 个 QUADAS 项目分析了 118 项研究。进行了荟萃回归和汇总分析,以确定方法学质量项目对诊断准确性估计的可能影响。

结果

冠状动脉 CTA 研究的整体方法学质量仅为中等。它们满足了 12 项中的中位数 7.5 项。118 项研究中只有 9 项满足了超过 75%的 QUADAS 项目。一个 QUADAS 项目(“无法解释的结果”)对诊断准确性的估计有显著影响(P=0.02),“不满足”将特异性从 86%提高到 90%。此外,汇总分析表明,任何不满足的 QUADAS 项目都有可能改变诊断准确性的估计。

结论

评估非侵入性冠状动脉 CTA 诊断准确性的研究的方法学质量仅为中等,且被发现会影响敏感性和特异性。由于良好的方法学对于充分评估成像技术至关重要,因此非常需要改进。

关键点

  • 良好的方法学质量是诊断准确性研究的基本要求。

  • 大多数冠状动脉 CTA 研究的设计质量仅为中等。

  • 方法学质量较弱会影响敏感性和特异性。

  • 方法学质量在一段时间内没有改善。

  • 作者在进行准确性研究时应考虑 QUADAS 清单。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验