Suppr超能文献

智能手机应用程序在阿片类药物换算中可靠性的比较。

A comparison of the reliability of smartphone apps for opioid conversion.

机构信息

Neonatal Department, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

Drug Saf. 2013 Feb;36(2):111-7. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0015-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many medical professionals use smartphone applications (apps) on a daily basis to support clinical decision making. Opioid switching (conversion of one opioid to another at equianalgesic dose) is common in clinical practice and often challenging for doctors. Apps providing an opioid conversion tool can therefore be a useful resource. Despite rapid growth in the use of medical apps, the lack of robust regulation and peer review to ensure the accuracy and reliability of app content is currently an area of concern.

METHOD

We searched major online app stores for apps providing an opioid dose conversion tool. We assessed output variability between apps in the dose calculation of seven opioid switches, as well as assessing the level of professional medical involvement in the authorship, creation and design of the apps.

RESULTS

Of 23 different apps identified, more than half (n = 12; 52 %) had no stated medical professional involvement and only 11 (48 %) apps provided direct references to primary sources for their opioid conversion ratios. Conversion of 1 mg of oral morphine to oral codeine demonstrated the largest conversion output range (median 6.67 mg, range 3.333-12 mg). Conversion of 1 mg of oral morphine to methadone ranged from 0.05-0.67 mg, with only 44 % of methadone-converting apps (n = 4) commenting that the conversion ratio changes with magnitude of methadone dose. Overall, 35 % of apps (n = 8) did not warn the user about the standard practice of dose reduction when opioid switching. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean conversion output for hydromorphone (oral) between apps with and without medical professional involvement (0.2256 vs 0.2536; p = 0.0377).

CONCLUSIONS

There are significant concerns with regard to the reliability of information provided by apps offering opioid dose conversion, with lack of information regarding evidence-based content and peer review in many cases. It is crucial that better regulation of medical apps is instigated in order to ensure that patient safety is maintained.

摘要

背景

许多医疗专业人员每天都在使用智能手机应用程序(apps)来支持临床决策。在临床实践中,阿片类药物转换(以等效镇痛剂量将一种阿片类药物转换为另一种阿片类药物)很常见,而且对医生来说常常具有挑战性。因此,提供阿片类药物转换工具的应用程序可以成为有用的资源。尽管医疗应用程序的使用迅速增长,但目前缺乏强有力的监管和同行评审来确保应用程序内容的准确性和可靠性,这是一个令人关注的问题。

方法

我们在主要的在线应用程序商店中搜索提供阿片类药物剂量转换工具的应用程序。我们评估了七种阿片类药物转换剂量计算中应用程序之间的输出差异,并评估了作者、创作和设计应用程序的专业医疗人员的参与程度。

结果

在确定的 23 个不同应用程序中,超过一半(n = 12;52%)没有说明有医疗专业人员参与,只有 11 个(48%)应用程序为其阿片类药物转换比提供了直接参考原始资料。将 1 毫克口服吗啡转换为口服可待因的转换输出范围最大(中位数为 6.67 毫克,范围为 3.333-12 毫克)。将 1 毫克口服吗啡转换为美沙酮的范围为 0.05-0.67 毫克,只有 44%的美沙酮转换应用程序(n = 4)指出,转换比随着美沙酮剂量的增加而变化。总体而言,35%的应用程序(n = 8)没有警告用户在阿片类药物转换时要减少剂量,这是一种标准做法。有医疗专业人员参与和没有医疗专业人员参与的氢吗啡酮(口服)应用程序之间的平均转换输出存在统计学显著差异(0.2256 与 0.2536;p = 0.0377)。

结论

提供阿片类药物剂量转换的应用程序提供的信息可靠性存在重大问题,在许多情况下,缺乏关于循证内容和同行评审的信息。必须启动对医疗应用程序的更好监管,以确保患者安全得到维护。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验