利用智能手机为患者开具急救药物输注医嘱的医学生,表现优于使用 BNFCs 的顾问医生。

Students prescribing emergency drug infusions utilising smartphones outperform consultants using BNFCs.

机构信息

Paediatric Department, Antrim Hospital, 45 Bush Road, Antrim, BT41 2RL, UK.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2011 Nov;82(11):1424-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.07.014. Epub 2011 Jul 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the use of a drugs calculator on a smartphone with use of the British National Formulary for Children (BNFC) for accuracy, speed and confidence of prescribing in a simulated paediatric emergency.

DESIGN

28 doctors and 7 medical students in a paediatric department of a District General Hospital, were asked to prescribe both a dopamine infusion and an adrenaline infusion for a hypotensive child. For one calculation they used the BNFC as their reference source and for the other they used the 'PICU Calculator' on the iPhone.

RESULTS

The drugs calculator on the smartphone was more accurate than the BNFC, with 28.6% of participants being able to correctly prescribe an inotropic infusion using the BNFC and 100% of participants being able to do so using the drugs calculator on the smartphone (p<0.001). The smartphone calculator was 376% quicker than the BNFC with the mean time saved being 5 min and 17s per participant (p<0.001). Participants were more confident in their prescription when using the drugs calculator on the smartphone with a mean confidence score of 8.5/10 compared with 3.5/10 when using the BNFC (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Utilising the smartphone was significantly more accurate and faster, with prescribers more confident in their calculations, than use of the BNFC. This applied irrespective of clinical experience with medical students utilising the smartphone technology outperforming Consultant Paediatricians when they used the BNFC.

摘要

目的

比较智能手机上的药物计算器与英国国家儿童配方(BNFC)在模拟儿科紧急情况下的准确性、速度和处方信心。

设计

在一家地区综合医院的儿科部门,28 名医生和 7 名医学生被要求为一名低血压儿童开多巴胺输液和肾上腺素输液。对于一种计算,他们使用 BNFC 作为参考源,对于另一种计算,他们使用 iPhone 上的“PICU 计算器”。

结果

智能手机上的药物计算器比 BNFC 更准确,28.6%的参与者能够使用 BNFC 正确开出处方,而 100%的参与者能够使用智能手机上的药物计算器开出处方(p<0.001)。智能手机计算器比 BNFC 快 376%,平均每位参与者节省 5 分钟 17 秒(p<0.001)。参与者在使用智能手机上的药物计算器时对处方更有信心,平均信心评分为 8.5/10,而使用 BNFC 时为 3.5/10(p<0.001)。

结论

与使用 BNFC 相比,使用智能手机在计算方面更准确、更快,且医生对计算结果更有信心。无论医学生使用智能手机技术的临床经验如何,他们的表现都优于使用 BNFC 的顾问儿科医生。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索