Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Apr;22(4):299-305. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001503. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
Emergency department (ED) overcrowding is a threat to patient safety and public health. Availability of specialty consultation to the ED may contribute to overcrowding. We implemented a novel intervention using education, goal setting and real-time performance feedback to improve time to admission for patients referred to general internal medicine (GIM).
Using a time-series design, we examined the effects of a quality improvement intervention on ED wait-times in an academic medical centre. The multifaceted approach included a didactic session for GIM housestaff on medicine triage principles and methods; setting a goal to have disposition decisions and, where appropriate, admission order within 4 h of consultation request; and providing personal data feedback on their performance on this metric to GIM housestaff during their rotation on the inpatient teaching service over a 1-year period. We compared time from consultation request to disposition decision and overall ED length of stay (LOS) for all patients referred to GIM during the intervention period (February 2011-February 2012) with data from the control period (January 2010-January 2011).
Mean time from GIM consultation request to admission order entry decreased by 92 min (SD, 5, p<0.05) from 321min in the control period to 229 min in the intervention period. Overall ED LOS for GIM patients decreased by 59 min (SD, 14, p<0.05) for admitted patients from 1022 min in the control period to 963 min in the intervention period, and by 40 min (SD, 13, p<0.05) for all patients referred to GIM. GIM staffing and patient characteristics remained stable across the two periods.
ED throughput for admitted medical patients improved with a quality improvement initiative involving education, goal setting and performance feedback.
急诊部(ED)过度拥挤对患者安全和公共健康构成威胁。ED 获得专科咨询可能会导致过度拥挤。我们实施了一项新的干预措施,通过教育、目标设定和实时绩效反馈,来提高转至普通内科(GIM)的患者的入院时间。
我们使用时间序列设计,检查了一项质量改进干预措施对学术医疗中心 ED 等待时间的影响。这种多方面的方法包括为 GIM 住院医师提供关于医学分诊原则和方法的讲座;设定目标,使在咨询请求后 4 小时内做出处置决定,并且在适当的情况下下达入院医嘱;并在 1 年内为 GIM 住院医师在住院教学服务期间提供关于他们在这一指标上表现的个人数据反馈。我们将干预期间(2011 年 2 月至 2012 年 2 月)所有转至 GIM 的患者从咨询请求到处置决定的时间和整体 ED 住院时间(LOS)与对照期间(2010 年 1 月至 2011 年 1 月)的数据进行比较。
从控制期的 321 分钟到干预期的 229 分钟,从 GIM 咨询请求到入院医嘱输入的平均时间减少了 92 分钟(SD,5,p<0.05)。在控制期为 1022 分钟,在干预期为 963 分钟,入院患者的整体 ED LOS 减少了 59 分钟(SD,14,p<0.05);对于所有转至 GIM 的患者,ED LOS 减少了 40 分钟(SD,13,p<0.05)。在两个时期,GIM 人员配备和患者特征保持稳定。
通过一项涉及教育、目标设定和绩效反馈的质量改进计划,ED 对入院医疗患者的吞吐量得到了改善。