Department of Neurology, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.
J Clin Neurol. 2012 Dec;8(4):265-70. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2012.8.4.265. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
Stroke requires consistent care, but there is concern over the "weekend effect", whereby a weekend admission results in a poor outcome. Our aim was to determine the impact of weekend admission on clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke in Korea.
The outcomes of patients admitted on weekdays and weekends were compared by analyzing data from a prospective outcome registry enrolling 1247 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke admitted to four neurology training hospitals in South Korea between September 2004 and August 2005. The primary outcome was a poor functional outcome at 3 months, defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 3-6. Secondary outcomes were 3-month mortality, use of thrombolysis, complication rate, and length of hospitalization. Shift analysis was also performed to compare overall mRS distributions.
On weekends, 334 (26.8%) patients were admitted. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the weekday and weekend groups except for more history of heart disease and shorter admission time in weekend group. Univariate analysis revealed poor functional outcome at 3 months, 3-month mortality, complication rate, and length of hospitalization did not differ between the two groups. In addition, overall mRS distributions were comparable (p=0.865). After adjusting for baseline factors and stroke severity, weekend admission was not associated with poor functional outcome at 3 months (adjusted odds ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.74-1.50). Furthermore, none of secondary endpoints differed between the two groups in multivariate analysis.
Weekend admission was not associated with poor functional outcome than weekday admission in patients with acute ischemic stroke in this study. The putative weekend effect should be explored further by considering a wider range of hospital settings and hemorrhagic stroke.
脑卒中需要持续护理,但存在“周末效应”的担忧,即周末入院会导致预后不良。本研究旨在探讨韩国急性缺血性脑卒中患者周末入院对临床结局的影响。
通过分析 2004 年 9 月至 2005 年 8 月韩国四家神经病学培训医院连续纳入的 1247 例急性缺血性脑卒中患者前瞻性结局登记资料,比较工作日和周末入院患者的结局。主要结局为 3 个月时功能结局不良,定义为改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)评分 3-6 分。次要结局为 3 个月死亡率、溶栓使用率、并发症发生率和住院时间。还进行了班次分析,以比较整体 mRS 分布。
周末入院 334 例(26.8%)。工作日和周末组之间的基线特征除了周末组有更多的心脏病史和较短的入院时间外,其余均相似。单因素分析显示,两组 3 个月时功能结局不良、3 个月死亡率、并发症发生率和住院时间无差异。此外,整体 mRS 分布相似(p=0.865)。在校正基线因素和卒中严重程度后,周末入院与 3 个月时功能结局不良无关(调整优势比,1.05;95%CI,0.74-1.50)。进一步多变量分析也显示两组间各次要结局无差异。
与工作日入院相比,周末入院对急性缺血性脑卒中患者的功能结局无不良影响。在更广泛的医院环境和出血性卒中情况下,应进一步探讨所谓的周末效应。