Interdepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
HIRA Research Institute, Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, Wonju, Republic of Korea.
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 22;18(6):e0283491. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283491. eCollection 2023.
Previous studies on the weekend effect-a phenomenon where stroke outcomes differ depending on whether the stroke occurred on a weekend-mostly targeted ischemic stroke and showed inconsistent results. Thus, we investigated the weekend effect on 30-day mortality in patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke considering the confounding effect of stroke severity and staffing level.
We retrospectively analyzed data of patients hospitalized for ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, which were extracted from the claims database of the National Health Insurance System and the Medical Resource Report by the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. The primary outcome measure was 30-day all-cause mortality.
In total, 278,632 patients were included, among whom 84,240 and 194,392 had a hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke, respectively, with 25.8% and 25.1% of patients, respectively, being hospitalized during the weekend. Patients admitted on weekends had significantly higher 30-day mortality rates (hemorrhagic stroke 16.84%>15.55%, p<0.0001; ischemic stroke 5.06%>4.92%, p<0.0001). However, in the multi-level logistic regression analysis adjusted for case-mix, pre-hospital, and hospital level factors, the weekend effect remained consistent in patients with hemorrhagic stroke (odds ratio [OR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.10), while the association was no longer evident in patients with ischemic stroke (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96-1.06).
Weekend admission for hemorrhagic stroke was significantly associated with a higher mortality rate after adjusting for confounding factors. Further studies are required to understand factors contributing to mortality during weekend admission.
之前关于“周末效应”的研究——即在周末发生的卒中患者其预后与非周末发生的卒中患者不同——主要针对缺血性卒中和结果不一致。因此,我们考虑到卒中严重程度和人员配备水平的混杂因素,对缺血性或出血性卒中的 30 天死亡率进行了“周末效应”的研究。
我们回顾性分析了 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间因缺血性或出血性卒中住院的患者的数据,这些数据从国家健康保险系统的索赔数据库和健康保险审查与评估服务的医疗资源报告中提取。主要观察指标为 30 天全因死亡率。
共纳入 278632 例患者,其中出血性卒中 84240 例,缺血性卒中 194392 例,分别有 25.8%和 25.1%的患者在周末住院。周末入院的患者 30 天死亡率明显较高(出血性卒中 16.84%>15.55%,p<0.0001;缺血性卒中 5.06%>4.92%,p<0.0001)。然而,在多水平逻辑回归分析中,调整病例组合、院前和医院水平因素后,出血性卒中患者的“周末效应”仍然一致(优势比[OR] 1.05,95%置信区间[CI] 1.00-1.10),而缺血性卒中患者的相关性不再明显(OR 1.01,95%CI 0.96-1.06)。
在调整混杂因素后,出血性卒中患者周末入院与死亡率升高显著相关。需要进一步研究了解周末入院导致死亡率升高的因素。