Dept. of Biochemistry, Univ. of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand.
J Food Sci. 2013 Feb;78(2):C170-7. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12027. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
The hydrolytic activity of 3 commercially available protease preparations (bacterial protease G, fungal 31000, and fungal 60000) were examined using fluorescent-labeled casein, azo dye-impregnated collagen, and meat protein extracts from bovine M. semimembranosus and Achilles tendon, and compared to that of papain. Assays showed that all proteases exhibited little activity at low temperature (5 °C), and maximal activity at 45 °C. The pH, at which optimal activity was observed for each of the protease preparations, differed and ranged from pH 5.0 to 8.0. Kinetic parameters (K(M) and V(max) ) were also different between protease preparations, with the bacterial protease G and papain exhibiting significantly higher V(max) values (P < 0.001) and lower K(M) values (P < 0.01) for the casein substrate than the 2 fungal protease preparations. Meat protein hydrolysis was displayed on SDS-PAGE and proteins analyzed with mass spectrometry. The protease preparations were shown to have varying affinity toward different meat proteins. The bacterial protease G preparation was efficient at hydrolyzing most myofibril and collagen proteins, and appeared to be more efficient than papain at hydrolyzing collagen proteins. On the other hand the 2 fungal protease preparations showed a selective specificity toward meat myofibrillar proteins, and the fungal 60000 protease preparation exhibited high affinity toward collagen γ and collagen type I chain B proteins. The results generated in this study demonstrated that these commercial proteases have good potential for use in meat tenderization applications due to their mild and complementary effects on different meat proteins.
Bacterial and fungal protease preparations exhibited varying affinities for hydrolyzing meat proteins. This selective moderate capability of microbial proteases compared to papain is potentially an advantage in avoiding over-tenderization in meat. On the other hand, the bacterial protease G preparation, which appeared to be more efficient at hydrolyzing connective tissue proteins than papain, could be beneficial in tenderizing meat with high connective tissue content. The synergistic effect of these protease preparations could be incorporated into a meat tenderizing formula to give the tenderizer a broad activity spectrum, thus able to target different cuts of meat.
研究了三种市售蛋白酶制剂(细菌蛋白酶 G、真菌 31000 和真菌 60000)的水解活性,使用荧光标记的酪蛋白、偶氮染料浸渍的胶原蛋白以及来自牛半膜肌和跟腱的肉蛋白提取物进行了检测,并与木瓜蛋白酶进行了比较。结果显示,所有蛋白酶在低温(5°C)下活性较低,在 45°C 时活性最高。每种蛋白酶制剂的最佳活性 pH 值不同,范围在 pH 5.0 到 8.0 之间。动力学参数(K(M)和 V(max))也因蛋白酶制剂而异,细菌蛋白酶 G 和木瓜蛋白酶对酪蛋白底物的 V(max)值(P<0.001)和 K(M)值(P<0.01)明显更高,而 2 种真菌蛋白酶制剂则更低。SDS-PAGE 显示了肉蛋白水解,并用质谱法分析了蛋白质。结果表明,蛋白酶制剂对不同的肉蛋白具有不同的亲和力。细菌蛋白酶 G 制剂能有效水解大多数肌原纤维和胶原蛋白,且似乎比木瓜蛋白酶更有效地水解胶原蛋白。另一方面,2 种真菌蛋白酶制剂对肉肌原纤维蛋白具有选择性特异性,真菌 60000 蛋白酶制剂对胶原蛋白 γ 和胶原蛋白 I 链 B 蛋白具有高亲和力。本研究结果表明,由于这些商业蛋白酶对不同的肉蛋白具有温和且互补的作用,因此它们在嫩化应用中具有很好的应用潜力。实际应用:细菌和真菌蛋白酶制剂对水解肉蛋白的亲和力不同。与木瓜蛋白酶相比,微生物蛋白酶的这种选择性适度能力可能在避免肉过度嫩化方面具有优势。另一方面,细菌蛋白酶 G 制剂似乎比木瓜蛋白酶更有效地水解结缔组织蛋白,因此对含有高结缔组织含量的肉进行嫩化可能会受益。这些蛋白酶制剂的协同作用可以纳入肉嫩化配方中,使嫩化剂具有广泛的活性谱,从而能够针对不同的肉块。