The Center for Hip and Knee Surgery, St. Francis Hospital, 1199 Hadley Road, Mooresville, IN 46158, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jan 16;95(2):126-31. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00607.
Implant survival after total knee arthroplasty has historically been dependent on postoperative knee alignment, although failure may occur when alignment is correct. Preoperative knee alignment has not been thoroughly evaluated as a possible risk factor for implant failure after arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of preoperative knee alignment on implant survival after total knee arthroplasty.
We performed a retrospective review of 5342 total knee arthroplasties performed with use of cemented Anatomic Graduated Component implants from 1983 to 2006. Each knee was independently measured preoperatively and postoperatively for overall coronal alignment. Neutral ranges for preoperative and postoperative alignment were defined by means of Cox proportional hazards regression.
The overall failure rate was 1.0% (fifty-four of 5342 prostheses); failure was defined as aseptic loosening of the femoral and/or tibial component. The average preoperative anatomical alignment (and standard deviation) was 0.1° ± 7.7° of varus (range, 25° of varus to 35° of valgus), and the average postoperative anatomical alignment (and standard deviation) was 4.7° ± 2.5° of valgus (range, 12° of varus to 20° of valgus). The failure rate in knees in >8° of varus preoperatively (2.2%; p = 0.0005) or >11° of valgus preoperatively (2.4%; p = 0.0081) was elevated when compared with knees in neutral preoperatively (0.71%). Knees with preoperative deformities corrected to postoperative neutral alignment (2.5° through 7.4°) had a lower failure rate (1.9%) than undercorrected or overcorrected knees (3.0%) (p = 0.0103). Knees with postoperative neutral alignment, regardless of preoperative alignment, had a lower failure rate (0.74%) than knees with postoperative alignment of <2.5° or >7.4° of anatomic valgus (1.7%) (p < 0.0001).
Patients with excessive preoperative alignment (>8° of varus or >11° of valgus) have a greater risk of failure (2.3%). Neutral postoperative alignment (2.5° through 7.4° of valgus) improves (1.9% for preoperatively deformed knees) but does not completely eliminate the risk of failure (0.5% for knees that were neutral both preoperatively and postoperatively). Careful attention should be paid to knee alignment during total knee arthroplasty, especially for patients with severe preoperative deformities.
全膝关节置换术后的植入物存活率一直以来都依赖于术后膝关节对线,尽管对线正确时也可能会发生失败。术前膝关节对线尚未被充分评估为关节置换术后植入物失败的可能危险因素。本研究的目的是分析术前膝关节对线对全膝关节置换术后植入物存活率的影响。
我们对 1983 年至 2006 年期间使用粘结式解剖学梯度组件植入物进行的 5342 例全膝关节置换术进行了回顾性研究。每例膝关节在术前和术后均分别独立测量整体冠状对线。通过 Cox 比例风险回归定义术前和术后对线的中性范围。
总的失败率为 1.0%(54/5342 例假体);失败定义为股骨和/或胫骨组件的无菌性松动。术前解剖对线的平均(及标准差)为 0.1°±7.7°的内翻(范围为 25°的内翻至 35°的外翻),术后解剖对线的平均(及标准差)为 4.7°±2.5°的外翻(范围为 12°的内翻至 20°的外翻)。术前存在>8°内翻(2.2%;p=0.0005)或>11°外翻(2.4%;p=0.0081)的膝关节的失败率高于术前对线中性的膝关节(0.71%)。术前存在畸形且术后对线校正为中立位(2.5°~7.4°)的膝关节的失败率(1.9%)低于校正不足或过度校正的膝关节(3.0%)(p=0.0103)。术后对线为中立位(无论术前对线如何)的膝关节的失败率(0.74%)低于术后对线<2.5°或>7.4°的解剖学外翻位(1.7%)(p<0.0001)。
术前对线过大(>8°内翻或>11°外翻)的患者发生失败的风险更高(2.3%)。中立位的术后对线(2.5°~7.4°的外翻)可改善(术前畸形膝关节为 1.9%),但并不能完全消除失败风险(术前和术后均为中立位的膝关节为 0.5%)。在全膝关节置换术中应特别注意膝关节对线,尤其是对线严重畸形的患者。