Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Sep;24(6 Suppl):39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.034. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
A recent study has challenged the premise that well-aligned total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) have better survival than outliers. This study examines the importance of overall coronal alignment as a predictor for revision. Patients with primary TKAs were stratified into neutral, varus, and valgus alignment groups based on the postoperative tibiofemoral angle. In 6070 knees (3992 patients), there were 51 failures (0.84%): 21 (0.5%) in the neutral group, 18 (1.8%) in the varus group, and 12 (1.5%) in the valgus group. The best survival was for overall alignment between 2.4 degrees and 7.2 degrees of valgus. Varus knees failed primarily by medial tibia collapse, whereas valgus knees failed from ligament instability. Outliers in overall alignment have a higher rate of revision than well-aligned knees. The goal of TKA should be to restore alignment within 2.4 degrees to 7.2 degrees of valgus.
最近的一项研究挑战了这样一个前提,即完全对齐的全膝关节置换术(TKA)比异常的膝关节具有更好的生存率。本研究探讨了整体冠状面对线作为翻修预测因素的重要性。根据术后胫股角,将初次 TKA 患者分为中立、内翻和外翻对线组。在 6070 个膝关节(3992 例患者)中,有 51 例失败(0.84%):中立组 21 例(0.5%),内翻组 18 例(1.8%),外翻组 12 例(1.5%)。最佳生存率为整体对线在 2.4 度到 7.2 度外翻之间。内翻膝关节主要因内侧胫骨塌陷而失效,而外翻膝关节则因韧带不稳定而失效。整体对线的异常对线比对线良好的膝关节有更高的翻修率。TKA 的目标应该是将对线恢复到 2.4 度到 7.2 度外翻。