Combrink Michael P, Carr Graham, Mans Ben J, Marais Frances
Parasites, Vectors and Vector-borne Diseases Programme, ARC-Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute.
Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2012 Dec 6;79(1):E1-4. doi: 10.4102/ojvr.v79i1.491.
The use of 1.16 mg/kg (one third) of the recommended dose of diminazene aceturate, administered indiscriminately to cattle on day seven of the unfrozen Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina bivalent live blood vaccine reaction, was an infection and block treatment method of immunisation used successfully with no known adverse effect on the parasites or the development of protective immunity. Continuing with this practice after replacement of the unfrozen vaccine with deep-frozen monovalent B. bovis and B. bigemina live blood vaccines resulted in reports of vaccine failure. Laboratory investigation indicated the harmful effect of block treatment in preventing the development of durable immunity against B. bigemina as opposed to the much lesser effect it had on B. bovis. Consequently the practice was no longer recommended. A B. bovis vaccination attempt aimed at controlling the disease of dairy cows in milk (n = 30) resulted in 20% fatalities during the expected vaccine reaction period. The practice of block treating B. bovis was therefore reinvestigated, this time in a field trial using dairy cattle in milk (n = 11). Using 0.88 mg/kg (one quarter) of the recommended dose of diminazene administered on day 12 of the B. bovis vaccine reaction resulted in only two animals (n = 5) testing ≥ 1/80 positive with the indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) although parasites could be demonstrated in three. In the untreated control group, by contrast, five of the vaccinated animals (n = 6) tested ≥ 1/80 positive with IFAT and parasites could be demonstrated in all. The unsatisfactory outcome obtained in this study, combined with that of the earlier investigation, indicated that there are more factors that influence successful vaccination than previously considered. It is therefore concluded that block treatment of the live frozen South African cattle babesiosis vaccines reactions is not recommended.
在未冷冻的牛巴贝斯虫和双芽巴贝斯虫二价活血液疫苗反应的第7天,对牛不加区分地使用1.16毫克/千克(推荐剂量的三分之一)的乙酰马啉嗪,这是一种感染和阻断治疗免疫方法,已成功使用,对寄生虫或保护性免疫的发展没有已知的不良影响。在用深度冷冻的单价牛巴贝斯虫和双芽巴贝斯虫活血液疫苗替代未冷冻疫苗后继续这种做法,导致了疫苗失败的报告。实验室调查表明,阻断治疗对预防双芽巴贝斯虫持久免疫的发展有有害影响,而对牛巴贝斯虫的影响则小得多。因此,不再推荐这种做法。一项旨在控制产奶牛疾病(n = 30)的牛巴贝斯虫疫苗接种尝试,在预期的疫苗反应期内导致了20%的死亡率。因此,再次对牛巴贝斯虫的阻断治疗做法进行了重新研究,这次是在一项使用产奶牛(n = 11)的田间试验中。在牛巴贝斯虫疫苗反应的第12天使用0.88毫克/千克(推荐剂量的四分之一)的乙酰马啉嗪,结果只有两只动物(n = 5)通过间接荧光抗体试验(IFAT)检测≥1/80呈阳性,尽管在三只动物中可以检测到寄生虫。相比之下,在未治疗的对照组中,五只接种疫苗的动物(n = 6)通过IFAT检测≥1/80呈阳性,并且在所有动物中都可以检测到寄生虫。这项研究获得的不理想结果,加上早期调查的结果,表明影响疫苗接种成功的因素比以前认为的更多。因此得出结论,不建议对冷冻的南非牛巴贝斯虫病活疫苗反应进行阻断治疗。