Suppr超能文献

预防证据转化实践(PEP)研究:在普通实践中实施预防主要血管疾病指南的方案-一项群组随机对照试验协议。

Preventive evidence into practice (PEP) study: implementation of guidelines to prevent primary vascular disease in general practice protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2013 Jan 18;8:8. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are significant gaps in the implementation and uptake of evidence-based guideline recommendations for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes in Australian general practice. This study protocol describes the methodology for a cluster randomised trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a model that aims to improve the implementation of these guidelines in Australian general practice developed by a collaboration between researchers, non-government organisations, and the profession.

METHODS

We hypothesise that the intervention will alter the behaviour of clinicians and patients resulting in improvements of recording of lifestyle and physiological risk factors (by 20%) and increased adherence to guideline recommendations for: the management of CVD and diabetes risk factors (by 20%); and lifestyle and physiological risk factors of patients at risk (by 5%). Thirty-two general practices will be randomised in a 1:1 allocation to receive either the intervention or continue with usual care, after stratification by state. The intervention will be delivered through: small group education; audit of patient records to determine preventive care; and practice facilitation visits adapted to the needs of the practices. Outcome data will be extracted from electronic medical records and patient questionnaires, and qualitative evaluation from provider and patient interviews.

DISCUSSION

We plan to disseminate study findings widely and directly inform implementation strategies by governments, professional bodies, and non-government organisations including the partner organisations.

摘要

背景

在澳大利亚的全科医疗实践中,基于证据的心血管疾病(CVD)和糖尿病指南推荐的实施和采用存在显著差距。本研究方案描述了一项集群随机试验的方法学,该试验旨在评估由研究人员、非政府组织和专业人员合作开发的旨在改善澳大利亚全科医疗实践中这些指南实施的模型的有效性。

方法

我们假设该干预措施将改变临床医生和患者的行为,从而使生活方式和生理风险因素的记录(提高 20%)和对以下指南建议的遵循率得到改善:CVD 和糖尿病风险因素的管理(提高 20%);以及处于风险中的患者的生活方式和生理风险因素(提高 5%)。32 家全科医疗实践将按照州分层,以 1:1 的比例随机分配接受干预或继续常规护理。干预措施将通过以下方式提供:小组教育;审核患者记录以确定预防保健;以及根据实践需求进行的实践促进访问。将从电子病历和患者问卷中提取结果数据,并从提供者和患者访谈中进行定性评估。

讨论

我们计划广泛传播研究结果,并直接为政府、专业机构和非政府组织(包括合作伙伴组织)提供实施策略的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d007/3564812/3552b6350c4d/1748-5908-8-8-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验