Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Jan;109(1):22-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60005-0.
The wear of tooth structure opposing anatomically contoured zirconia crowns requires further investigation.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to measure the roughness and wear of polished, glazed, and polished then reglazed zirconia against human enamel antagonists and compare the measurements to those of veneering porcelain and natural enamel.
Zirconia specimens were divided into polished, glazed, and polished then reglazed groups (n=8). A veneering porcelain (Ceramco3) and enamel were used as controls. The surface roughness of all pretest specimens was measured. Wear testing was performed in the newly designed Alabama wear testing device. The mesiobuccal cusps of extracted molars were standardized and used as antagonists. Three-dimensional (3D) scans of the specimens and antagonists were obtained at baseline and after 200 000 and 400 000 cycles with a profilometer. The baseline scans were superimposed on the posttesting scans to determine volumetric wear. Data were analyzed with a 1-way ANOVA and Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) post hoc tests (α=.05)
Surface roughness ranked in order of least rough to roughest was: polished zirconia, glazed zirconia, polished then reglazed zirconia, veneering porcelain, and enamel. For ceramic, there was no measureable loss on polished zirconia, moderate loss on the surface of enamel, and significant loss on glazed and polished then reglazed zirconia. The highest ceramic wear was exhibited by the veneering ceramic. For enamel antagonists, polished zirconia caused the least wear, and enamel caused moderate wear. Glazed and polished then reglazed zirconia showed significant opposing enamel wear, and veneering porcelain demonstrated the most.
Within the limitations of the study, polished zirconia is wear-friendly to the opposing tooth. Glazed zirconia causes more material and antagonist wear than polished zirconia. The surface roughness of the zirconia aided in predicting the wear of the opposing dentition.
opposing anatomically contoured zirconia crowns 牙体结构的磨损需要进一步研究。
本体外研究的目的是测量经抛光、上釉和抛光后再上釉的氧化锆与人类牙釉质对抗牙的粗糙度和磨损,并将测量结果与饰面瓷和天然牙釉质进行比较。
将氧化锆样本分为抛光、上釉和抛光后再上釉组(n=8)。使用饰面瓷(Ceramco3)和牙釉质作为对照。所有测试前样本的表面粗糙度均进行了测量。在新设计的阿拉巴马磨损测试设备中进行磨损测试。提取磨牙的近中颊尖标准化并用作对抗牙。用轮廓仪在基线和 2000000 次和 4000000 次循环后获得样本和对抗牙的三维(3D)扫描。用基线扫描对测试后扫描进行叠加,以确定体积磨损。使用单向方差分析和 Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) 事后检验(α=.05)对数据进行分析。
表面粗糙度从最粗糙到最光滑的顺序为:抛光氧化锆、上釉氧化锆、抛光后再上釉氧化锆、饰面瓷和牙釉质。对于陶瓷,抛光氧化锆没有可测量的损失,牙釉质表面有中度损失,上釉和抛光后再上釉氧化锆有明显损失。饰面陶瓷表现出最高的陶瓷磨损。对于牙釉质对抗牙,抛光氧化锆造成的磨损最小,牙釉质造成中度磨损。上釉和抛光后再上釉氧化锆导致对抗牙明显磨损,而饰面瓷则磨损最严重。
在研究的限制范围内,抛光氧化锆对对抗牙具有良好的耐磨性。上釉氧化锆比抛光氧化锆导致更多的材料和对抗牙磨损。氧化锆的表面粗糙度有助于预测对抗牙的磨损。