PRIDE Research Foundation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Clin J Pain. 2013 Apr;29(4):334-40. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318267252d.
Lumbar flexion-relaxation (FR) is a well-known phenomenon that can reliably be seen in normal subjects but not in most chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. The purpose of this study was to determine which surface electromyographic (SEMG) measures of FR best distinguish CLBP patients from pain-free control subjects. Standing SEMG and lumbar flexion range of motion (ROM) were also evaluated.
A cohort of 218 CLBP patients, who were admitted to a functional restoration program, received a standardized SEMG and ROM assessment during standing trunk flexion and reextension. An asymptomatic control group of 30 nonpatients received an identical assessment. Both groups were compared on 8 separate SEMG and 3 flexion ROM measures.
A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine how well each measure distinguished between the CLBP patients and the pain-free control subjects. All SEMG measures of FR performed acceptably. Between 79% and 82% of patients, and 83% and 100% of controls were correctly classified. Standing SEMG performed less well. Gross flexion ROM was the best single classification measure tested, correctly classifying 88% of patients and 83% of controls. A series of discriminant analyses found that certain combinations of SEMG and ROM performed slightly better than gross ROM alone for correctly classifying the 2 subjects groups.
Because all SEMG measures of FR performed acceptably, the determination of which SEMG measure of FR is "best" is largely dependent on one's specific purpose. In addition, ROM measures were found to be important components of the FR assessment.
腰椎屈伸放松(FR)是一种众所周知的现象,在正常受试者中可以可靠地观察到,但在大多数慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者中则看不到。本研究的目的是确定 FR 的哪些表面肌电图(SEMG)测量指标最能区分 CLBP 患者与无疼痛对照受试者。还评估了站立时的 SEMG 和腰椎活动范围(ROM)。
一组 218 名接受功能恢复计划的 CLBP 患者在站立时接受了标准化的 SEMG 和 ROM 评估,包括腰椎前屈和后伸。一组 30 名无症状的非患者对照组接受了相同的评估。比较了两组 8 个独立的 SEMG 和 3 个腰椎前屈 ROM 测量值。
使用接收者操作特征曲线分析来确定每个测量值在区分 CLBP 患者和无疼痛对照组方面的表现如何。所有 FR 的 SEMG 测量值都表现良好。79%至 82%的患者和 83%至 100%的对照组被正确分类。站立时的 SEMG 表现较差。总屈伸 ROM 是测试的最佳单项分类指标,正确分类了 88%的患者和 83%的对照组。一系列判别分析发现,某些 SEMG 和 ROM 的组合在正确分类这 2 组受试者方面比单纯的总 ROM 略好。
由于 FR 的所有 SEMG 测量值都表现良好,因此确定哪种 FR 的 SEMG 测量值是“最佳”在很大程度上取决于特定的目的。此外,ROM 测量值是 FR 评估的重要组成部分。