• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护士对其职业权利的认知。

Nurses' perceptions of their professional rights.

机构信息

Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 2013 Jun;20(4):459-69. doi: 10.1177/0969733012466001. Epub 2013 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1177/0969733012466001
PMID:23329783
Abstract

The purpose of this study, which is part of a wider study of professional ethics, was to describe nurses' perceptions of their rights in Italy. The data were collected by open-ended focus group interviews and analyzed with inductive content analysis. Based on the analysis, three main themes were identified. The first theme "Unfamiliarity with rights" described nurses' perception that their rights mirrored historical roots, educational content, and nurses' and patients' position in the society. The second theme, "Rights reflected in legislation" highlighted that working and professional Italian legislation played a strong role. The third theme, "Managerial barriers for nurses' rights" underlined the nurses' perceptions that nursing management had the responsibility to create the conditions where nurses' rights could flourish. This study intends to contribute to the debate on this underexplored topic.

摘要

本研究旨在描述护士对其在意大利享有的权利的认知,是更广泛的职业伦理研究的一部分。研究数据通过开放式焦点小组访谈收集,并采用归纳内容分析法进行分析。基于分析结果,确定了三个主要主题。第一个主题“对权利的不熟悉”描述了护士的认知,即他们的权利反映了历史根源、教育内容以及护士和患者在社会中的地位。第二个主题“立法中的权利”强调了工作和专业意大利立法的重要作用。第三个主题“管理者对护士权利的障碍”强调了护士的看法,即护理管理有责任创造有利于护士权利发展的条件。本研究旨在为这一尚未充分探讨的话题的讨论做出贡献。

相似文献

1
Nurses' perceptions of their professional rights.护士对其职业权利的认知。
Nurs Ethics. 2013 Jun;20(4):459-69. doi: 10.1177/0969733012466001. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
2
A theoretical examination of the rights of nurses.护士权利的理论探讨。
Nurs Ethics. 2010 Sep;17(5):628-35. doi: 10.1177/0969733010373432.
3
Nurses' experiences of violation of their dignity.护士尊严受辱体验
Nurs Ethics. 2012 May;19(3):328-40. doi: 10.1177/0969733011433926.
4
Nurses' views on ethical codes: a focus group study.护士对道德准则的看法:一项焦点小组研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Jul;51(2):188-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03513.x.
5
Nurses' views on need for professional development in Nepal.尼泊尔护士对专业发展需求的看法。
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2010 Jul-Sep;49(179):209-15.
6
Nursing values in China: the expectations of registered nurses.中国的护理价值观:注册护士的期望。
Nurs Health Sci. 2009 Sep;11(3):312-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2009.00468.x.
7
Gerontological nurses' perceptions of their rights in Finland.芬兰老年护理护士对自身权利的看法。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2014 Jun;28(2):347-54. doi: 10.1111/scs.12064. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
8
Nurses' and managers' perceptions of continuing professional development for older and younger nurses: a focus group study.护士和管理人员对老年和年轻护士继续专业发展的看法:焦点小组研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Jan;50(1):34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.08.009. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
9
Professional and cultural conflicts for intensive care nurses.重症监护护士的专业和文化冲突。
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Apr;66(4):858-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05247.x.
10
Implementation of nurse-delivered vestibular rehabilitation in primary care: a qualitative study of nurses' views on involvement in an innovative service.初级保健中护士提供的前庭康复实施:关于护士对参与创新服务看法的定性研究
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jun;16(6):1072-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01511.x. Epub 2007 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Advanced competence in intensive care unit: expectations, role ambiguity between physicians and nurses in intensive care units. Multi - method survey.重症监护病房的高级能力:重症监护病房医生和护士之间的期望、角色模糊。多方法调查。
Acta Biomed. 2022 Jan 17;92(S2):e2021332. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS2.12670.
2
Nurses' lived experiences of professional autonomy in Iran.伊朗护士职业自主性的生活经历。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2019 May 23;6(3):315-321. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.05.002. eCollection 2019 Jul 10.