Paladino Maria-Paola, Zaniboni Sara, Fasoli Fabio, Vaes Jeroen, Volpato Chiara
University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2014 Jun;53(2):201-16. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12023. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
By taking advantage of the Italian protest in 2009 in reaction to the behaviour of then Prime Minister Berlusconi, in this research, we investigated the role of sexist beliefs (i.e., hostile sexism, complementary gender differentiation, protective paternalism, and heterosexual intimacy) and group-based emotional reactions (i.e., anger, humiliation, and sadness) to women's and men's action mobilization against public forms of sexism. The findings of this study suggest that women and men engaged in this protest for different reasons. Women mobilized to express their anger at Berlusconi's sexist behaviour, an emotion related to the condemnation of hostile sexist views and benevolent sexist beliefs about heterosexual intimacy. In contrast, the strength of men's participation in the protest was affected by humiliation, an emotion related to the condemnation of hostile sexist beliefs and support for complementary gender differentiation. This emotional path suggests that men likely protested to restore their reputations. These findings underline the role of sexist beliefs and group-based emotions in transforming the condemnation of a sexist event into action mobilization against sexism for both women and men.
通过利用2009年意大利针对时任总理贝卢斯科尼的行为所发起的抗议活动,在本研究中,我们调查了性别歧视信念(即敌意性别歧视、互补性性别差异、保护性家长作风和异性亲密关系)以及基于群体的情绪反应(即愤怒、羞辱和悲伤)对女性和男性针对公开形式的性别歧视采取行动动员的作用。这项研究的结果表明,女性和男性参与此次抗议的原因不同。女性动员起来是为了表达她们对贝卢斯科尼性别歧视行为的愤怒,这种情绪与对敌意性别歧视观点以及关于异性亲密关系的善意性别歧视信念的谴责有关。相比之下,男性参与抗议的强度受到羞辱情绪的影响,这种情绪与对敌意性别歧视信念的谴责以及对互补性性别差异的支持有关。这种情绪路径表明,男性可能是为了恢复他们的声誉而进行抗议。这些发现强调了性别歧视信念和基于群体的情绪在将对性别歧视事件的谴责转化为针对性别歧视的行动动员方面,对女性和男性所起的作用。