Athlin Simon, Strålin Kristoffer
Department of Infectious Diseases , Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
Scand J Infect Dis. 2013 Jun;45(6):425-31. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2012.760843. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
The use of nasopharyngeal secretions to enhance diagnostic yields of pneumococcal aetiology in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is of interest. We evaluated the Binax NOW Streptococcus pneumoniae immunochromatographic test (ICT) on nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPA) in order to support pneumococcal aetiology in CAP.
The NPA ICT was applied on 180 adult CAP patients and 64 healthy controls. The rate of pneumococcal detection in the nasopharynx was compared to rates for lytA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and culture on NPA.
According to blood and sputum culture and urine ICT, the test sensitivity in 59 patients with a pneumococcal aetiology was 81%. The specificity was suboptimal, with 72% negative tests among CAP patients without a pneumococcal aetiology. However, the test was positive in only 11% of patients with atypical pneumonia and in 4.7% of healthy controls. The positivity rate was higher for NPA ICT compared to culture on NPA in all CAP patients, and to both PCR and culture on NPA in non-pneumococcal non-atypical CAP patients. In 113 (63%) patients with β-lactam monotherapy, cure without treatment alteration was noted more often in cases with positive compared to negative NPA ICT at admission (91% vs 69%; p < 0.01).
The high sensitivity and the low positivity rates in patients with atypical pneumonia and healthy controls, in combination with the correlation between positive test results and clinical cure with β-lactam therapy, may support a pneumococcal aetiology in CAP in populations with low pneumococcal carriage rates.
利用鼻咽分泌物提高社区获得性肺炎(CAP)肺炎球菌病因诊断率备受关注。我们评估了Binax NOW肺炎链球菌免疫层析试验(ICT)用于鼻咽抽吸物(NPA),以支持CAP的肺炎球菌病因诊断。
对180例成年CAP患者和64例健康对照者应用NPA ICT。将鼻咽部肺炎球菌检测率与NPA的lytA聚合酶链反应(PCR)和培养率进行比较。
根据血培养、痰培养和尿ICT,59例肺炎球菌病因患者的检测敏感性为81%。特异性欠佳,在无肺炎球菌病因的CAP患者中,72%的检测结果为阴性。然而,该试验在仅11%的非典型肺炎患者和4.7%的健康对照者中呈阳性。在所有CAP患者中,NPA ICT的阳性率高于NPA培养,在非肺炎球菌非典型CAP患者中,高于NPA的PCR和培养。在113例(63%)接受β-内酰胺单药治疗的患者中,入院时NPA ICT阳性的患者与阴性患者相比,未改变治疗而治愈的情况更常见(91%对69%;p<0.01)。
在肺炎球菌携带率较低的人群中,非典型肺炎患者和健康对照者中高敏感性和低阳性率,以及阳性检测结果与β-内酰胺治疗临床治愈之间的相关性,可能支持CAP的肺炎球菌病因。